User talk:Kakyeampong

Copyright problems with Kwaku akyeampong
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Kwaku akyeampong, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Kwaku akyeampong appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Kwaku akyeampong has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Kwaku akyeampong and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Kwaku akyeampong with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Kwaku akyeampong.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. JNW (talk) 16:30, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

December 2008
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam); and,
 * 4) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. JNW (talk) 16:30, 9 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Right. Per the above, you shouldn't be writing about yourself.  It could also be considered improper advertising (see WP:SPAM).  NawlinWiki (talk) 16:58, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Spam in Earned Value Management Institute® EVMI®
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Earned Value Management Institute® EVMI®, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Earned Value Management Institute® EVMI® is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Earned Value Management Institute® EVMI®, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 00:40, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Kwaku Akyeampong
A tag has been placed on Kwaku Akyeampong requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.  TN ‑  X   - Man  15:48, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, but I had to delete this article because it does not currently meet Wikipedia guidelines. Please note that all articles on people must meet the Wikipedia inclusion guidelines for people.  This generally means that the person must have been the subject of significant coverage in multiple independent, reliable sources, such as newspapers, magazines, or books.  Websites are generally not considered to be reliable sources, although there are exceptions.  You also appear to have a close connection with the subject of this article; it might be wise to read the conflict of interest policy to ensure that you don't accidentally break the rules.  Wikipedia has a lot of rules, and it can be confusing at first (my first few articles were deleted too).  If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on my talk page or that of any other experienced Wikipedian.  Happy editing! Karanacs (talk) 15:54, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Earned Value Management Institute
A tag has been placed on Earned Value Management Institute requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Blowdart | talk 19:13, 12 December 2008 (UTC)