User talk:Kalarimaster

Welcome!

Hello, Kalarimaster, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Ism schism (talk) 18:03, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Speedy deletion of Sun Pictures
A tag has been placed on Sun Pictures requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Leonard( Bloom ) 14:43, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

a friendly message
Hi - don't meant to interfere, but I suggest you don't take that heated discussion on Talk:India too personally. Don't be so aggressive towards others. Be cool and I'm sure your arguments will be respected. S h i v a (Visnu) (talk) 02:44, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

November 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. KnowledgeHegemonyPart2 10:28, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

My opinion/A request
Hi. I would like to request that you take a more condusive attitude to this discussion in the India page. It is important to come to concensus and not take the "my way or highway" attitude as that will take you nowhere. Please rethink your position on the options being put out so the process can be easy.Dineshkannambadi (talk) 12:14, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

civil
Pls stop abusing people and learn to remain civil. You will get blocked if you continue abusing. Pls read WP:Civil and WP:Blocking.  Docku: “what up?”  21:24, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Talk:Languages of India
Dear user:Kalarimaster, Could you kindly answer questions asked of you here? Best regards, Fowler&amp;fowler  «Talk»  17:42, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

your edits
Your indiscriminate do-first-discuss-later sort of edits in Languages of India and Official languages of India articles which have been in good standing for a reasonable time are not helping the project in any meaningful sense. It is just wasting all our time. My previous interactions with you in other talk pages indicate to me that you are yet to develop a better understanding of the intricacies of how wikipedia works.

I am not in any way implying that the articles you are involved in editing are in their best possible shape, there are just better ways. Please also note that it is very much likely that you may be just wrong if many disagree with you. I certainly hope you will engage in discussion to achieve consensus before unilaterally changing the article content in future. I would also request you to read all wikipedia policies several times over if you are here to stay.  Docku:  What up?  21:12, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
 * May I second Docku's opinion above and add the India page to the list of pages of concern. Let me plead this ernestly: making unilateral edits, without seeking consensus, on a much visited FA like India, is very unhelpful, especially since these issues have been discussed to death before. Please read the discussions of July 2007 in the archives of that page.  Best regards,  Fowler&amp;fowler  «Talk»  15:51, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Your edits to India
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox.

Frustrating

 * No, your blocks have never been political, they have been due to your behaviour around here...unless you're willing to accept responsibility for your actions, you will never be unblocked. ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 08:55, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * You have no idea, what happened during the last years. Don't comment on things you can't know or don't have any knowledge about India, history, languages, politics, Arayanism, Dalits, Brahmins, etc.--Kalarimaster (talk) 08:58, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Please guys. I don't want to harm anything or anybody. I want m edit warringy identity back, which has been robbed long ago by experienced users, who are against Dravidian nationalists. They need to accept our mindset and deal with us encyclopedically--Kalarimaster (talk) 09:16, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * You still continue to blame others ... however, I have brought this to the wider attention of Administrators at WP:AN. ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 09:26, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Interesting. SpacemanSpiff is a very suspicious old editor avatar. He god admin rights incredibly fast for basically no significant contribution. He worked well with Yellowmonkey who blocked me for the joke account. I'd like to know who he really is...--Kalarimaster (talk) 09:41, 6 July 2011 (UTC)


 * I have a suggestion. Take one or more independent admins, controling my edits and behaviour in the next few days or weeks. If you see, that I really engage in vandalism or attacking others personally, edit warring, refuse discussion, socking etc. I may be blocked accordingly. Isn't this a fair deal?--Kalarimaster (talk) 11:18, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * A) You're not in any position to negotiate. B) You have proven this morning alone that you're not capable of acting collegially.  Massive WP:FAIL ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 12:14, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * This is nonsense. Reverting fringe theories is a duty of any wikipedian. Spiffman has blocked me for block evasion, typical way of him to silence me. Everyone in this field knows me and my socks and he waits only, when its appropriate to block me per block evasion argument.. now I had enough, and came to limelight and set things straight. Spiffman obviously enjoys to block me every single time, when it hurts the most (Malayalam as an example being my mothertongue). I seriously have problems with his attitude, and the result is seen here by more socks out of frustration. I think, there is no further need of explanation. I will never become friends with such sadists.--Kalarimaster (talk) 12:32, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh, I've had a look at Malayalam, and it's clear that you have been using multiple sockpuppet accounts even as recently as yesterday and today - you have no chance of being unblocked while you are still doing that -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:48, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Yesterday, multiple accounts? I doubt you analyzed it correctly, since yesterday there was only the main sock..User:Malaikaran around. The following socks I have explained earlier. How do you expect me to use no socks without a main account availability for years? Could you please make up your mind and read my statements properly and reopen unblock? I like editing Wikipedia and working with other wikipedians. That's nothing I need to prove anyone. That's a basic attitude of mine, without that I wouldn't extensively engage in countless discussions about many different topics.--Kalarimaster (talk) 13:02, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Creating multiple socks to engage in an edit-war, for whatever reason you did it, and then making abusive comments about other people here on your Talk page, is not the way to get yourself unblocked, and I am not going to reverse my decline of your most recent request. You may, if you wish, make a fresh request and see if another admin is prepared to unblock you -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:15, 6 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks for watching.--Kalarimaster (talk) 14:12, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Pretty much enough
When you signed up for your VERY FIRST account, you agreed to some rules. These servers, and the services they provide are PRIVATELY OWNED, meaning you have ZERO rights - you're entitled to use the services as long as you abide by the rules you agreed to. First rule: one person, one account. As per WP:EVADE, you may NEVER edit (not even anonymously) if your first account is blocked. You do not get any "special privileges" because you know the WP:TRUTH or if you believe you're correcting some grievous wrong on the project - those rules apply to you 110% of the time. It does not matter if you feel you were "not given a chance", y ou actually DID have a chance - many of them, and you continued to fart in direction of the rules. Today alone you suggest again and again that you were within some kind of rights to ignore the rules because they magically don't apply to you. Well ... THEY DO. Have you ever seen a "no trespassing" sign? Did it apply to you? Get it through your head: YOU broke the rules, and you get no special treatment. ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 14:03, 6 July 2011 (UTC)


 * I don't want special treatment. Fact of the matter is, I like editing wp, and I've chosen to use the unblock feature, which the community provides. Nothing to get hot about it.--Kalarimaster (talk) 14:11, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Really? You said yourself that you did not agree with the first block, which is why you chose to WP:EVADE using WP:SOCKs.  Hey, guess what ... you don't get to do that.  As such, you're CLEARLY asking for some magical special treatment that other sockfarm-masters do not get. ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 14:33, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm a Dravidian, special treatment is Anti-Dravidian/Pro-Casteism.. Not my cup of tea.. try to harass some other guys with a lower intellect --Kalarimaster (talk) 14:54, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * OK, that's your last personal attack. Talk page access revoked. --jpgordon:==( o ) 15:01, 6 July 2011 (UTC)