User talk:Kalebfloyd075370

April 2018
Hello, I'm UW Dawgs. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. UW Dawgs (talk) 23:35, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Also, you appear to be repeatedly changing the count of Georgia's consensus All-Americans from 25 to 33. without providing a citation. I believe some of the ambiguity is from counting people vs people-seasons. What are your thoughts? UW Dawgs (talk) 23:45, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

December 2018
Hello, I'm UW Dawgs. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. UW Dawgs (talk) 00:29, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. UW Dawgs (talk) 17:29, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Georgia Bulldogs football. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. UW Dawgs (talk) 15:52, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Georgia Bulldogs football. UW Dawgs (talk) 15:10, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   11:22, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:47, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

January 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of NCAA football teams by wins.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Southeastern Conference. UW Dawgs (talk) 15:59, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:07, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
 * This is getting old. If it becomes necessary to block you again for this behavior, it will likely be indefinite. We prefer original mistakes. -Ad Orientem (talk) 16:09, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

 * unblock| I only use one account on Wikipedia so I would liked to be unblocked so that I could put useful information in Wikipedia pages &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;}}