User talk:Kaliamboslef

Welcome!

Hello, Kaliamboslef, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as New ideas in physics, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! &mdash; RHaworth 21:56, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of New ideas in physics


The article New ideas in physics has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * original research

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &mdash; RHaworth 21:56, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of New ideas in physics for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article New ideas in physics, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/New ideas in physics until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The Anome (talk) 08:23, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of New ideas in quantum physics for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article New ideas in quantum physics, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/New ideas in quantum physics until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  Anna Lincoln  11:50, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

November 2010
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at New ideas in quantum physics, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard.  Anna Lincoln  11:51, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of FRONTIERS OF FUNDAMENTAL PHYSICS


A tag has been placed on FRONTIERS OF FUNDAMENTAL PHYSICS requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. WWGB (talk) 11:53, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

December 2010
This is your last warning; the next time you create an inappropriate page, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Alexf(talk) 14:25, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of New ideas in FRONTIERS OF FUNDAMENTAL PHYSICS


A tag has been placed on New ideas in FRONTIERS OF FUNDAMENTAL PHYSICS requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Feezo (Talk) 11:33, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeatedly trying to use Wikipedia to publish original research, despite warnings. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JohnCD (talk) 11:56, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Kaliamboslef
User:Kaliamboslef, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Kaliamboslef. You are free to edit the content of User:Kaliamboslef during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion.

You are still able to edit this talk page: if you wish to contribute to the discussion, you may comment below here and I will copy what you write across. First, please read the guideline WP:UPNOT. JohnCD (talk) 11:38, 7 January 2012 (UTC)