User talk:Kalifast

Speedy deletion nomination of Kalifast
Hello Kalifast,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Kalifast for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vítor (talk) 10:01, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Blocked
There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ian.thomson (talk) 11:56, 16 July 2016 (UTC)


 * So, in other words, you are sharing your account and you want to use it to advertise your products?
 * And the reason HP, Microsoft, and so on are listed is because people who do not work for them cited independent reliable sources that were not written by anyone working for those companies. For example, the Microsoft article was written by people who do not work for Microsoft, and that article is based mostly on sources that were not written by Microsoft.  Ian.thomson (talk) 17:29, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
 * In answer to the request to remove those other articles, may I refer you to WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS? Wikipedia is not a directory where everyone can have an entry. It is based on notability - our definition of notability, that is. It can mean that a certain bus shelter on a Scottish island has an article, but a large company making own brand goods for supermarket chains doesn't. One passes notability, the other didn't. BTW you don't have to use your real world name - a lot of us prefer to mask our outside IDs. We even have an admin called 'Boing! said Zebeddee'... Peridon (talk) 22:07, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Are you serious ?
The only things you reproach is to have créated an account with Kalifast name.

Wikipédia have a lot of solutions référenced on all pages.

Kalifast is à solution présented 4 times at the Jftl, the solution is present at Ucaat ....

Put à line in table comparaison where other solutions on which some solution don't make 10% of that. Saying we make advertisement It s big joke if you keep other informations. ...

Our objective is to complete your pages with the Best information.

Now I will ask someone to write about us. Thats notre realy complicated. ...

Regards

Alphonse

Kalifast (talk) 07:16, 17 July 2016 (UTC)