User talk:Kalina3112

Welcome!
Hello, Kalina3112, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Treatment Tourism ©, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Liz Read! Talk! 12:37, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Treatment Tourism ©


A tag has been placed on Treatment Tourism ©, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz Read! Talk! 12:37, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Treatment Home Healthcare ©


A tag has been placed on Treatment Home Healthcare ©, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz Read! Talk! 12:37, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Medical Detox Des Cierges ©


A tag has been placed on Medical Detox Des Cierges ©, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz <b style="color:#006400;">Read!</b> <b style="color:#006400;">Talk!</b> 12:38, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Medical Detox Des Cierges ©
Hello Kalina3112,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Medical Detox Des Cierges © for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone (talk) 12:38, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

July 2015
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Agtx (talk) 12:42, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Please try to use draft space
Thank you for your recent contributions. Getting started creating new articles on Wikipedia can be tricky, and you might like to try creating a draft version first, which you can then ask for feedback on if necessary, with less risk of deletion. Do make sure you also read help available to you, including Your First Article and the Tutorial. You might also like to try the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. Thank you. The Average Wikipedian (talk) 08:20, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:TheScottCEO.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:TheScottCEO.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:07, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dan Mândrilă
Hello, Kalina3112. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Dan Mândrilă, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 11:11, 26 September 2015 (UTC) -->

File permission problem with File:Private Industry Rehabilitation Headquarters Ontario, CA.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Private Industry Rehabilitation Headquarters Ontario, CA.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 14:08, 2 October 2015 (UTC) (talk) I contacted the owner and she should get in touch with the Wikipedia staff in the next few days. Steel1943 (talk The owner of the deleted image contacted Wiki's staff on the permissions e-mail, but the image was deleted nevertheless. I am confused.--Kalina3112 (talk) 19:28, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

John D. Haines
Please note that you may not remove an AFD template from the article. Once the discussion has been initiated, the template must remain on the article until the discussion is closed by an administrator — you do not have personal discretion to remove the template at your own choice while the discussion is still active. If the template is removed again, I will be forced to lock the article so that you cannot edit it at all. Bearcat (talk) 17:00, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Yes. I understand. I did add aditional sources and removed the subjective statements as much as possible. Hopefully this will help. (User:Bearcat) 12:49, 6 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The Argonauts roster, for the record, just lists a "Haines" without a first name, and gives the year on the roster as "04" without clarifying whether they mean 2004 or 1904. Haines isn't a rare enough surname that any reference to someone named Haines without specifying a first name can automatically be assumed to be John D. Haines in particular, and the possible years are both problematic — 1904 is before John Haines was even born, and 2004 is after he retired from football. So that roster doesn't prove that John D. Haines in particular, rather than some other person with the same surname, ever played for the Argonauts. The newspaper sources I found (and the Saint John Wanderers history you added to the article) put him in the Maritime Football League, not the CFL — and unfortunately, the Maritime Football League is not a league that gets its players an automatic inclusion freebie on Wikipedia just because they existed. Bearcat (talk) 12:33, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

talk True. Will try to find other sources. Thank you. The page has been deleted, so I guess I would have to rewrite it.

File permission problem with File:TheScottCEO.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:TheScottCEO.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:45, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Sfan00 IMG I contacted the owner and she should get back to you in the next few days.

British diaspora
Hi. Can you please stop adding references to British diaspora that don't appear to support the material in the article? If you think the sources are relevant, please explain why on the article talk page. Cordless Larry (talk) 13:23, 13 October 2015 (UTC)


 * talk Hi, this was in support of Spain being one of the popular destinations for Brits in Europe. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.152.172.2 (talk) 13:29, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
 * That fact is already established and sourced in the article. Adding a link to a page about the "Best European countries to live in" is unnecessary and not really relevant. It probably isn't a reliable source either. Cordless Larry (talk) 13:36, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Please stop adding these "Who loves Brits"-type references to articles. They are promotional and do not help to verify facts in the articles you're adding them to. Cordless Larry (talk) 09:10, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

(talk) I do not see anything promotional about a link from the praguepost. It is as reliable as any other media has a high domain authority. It is another thing, if you think the link is not suitable to be added in this particular context. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kalina3112 (talk • contribs) 10:01, 15 October 2015‎ (UTC)
 * Thanks for your reply. The Prague Post is fine, but they are just republishing material from Ampilot, which is what you appear to be promoting. I also fail to see how the source supports the statement that "English emigrant and ethnic descent communities are found across the world, and in some places, settled in significant numbers". Cordless Larry (talk) 10:36, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Signing posts
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 10:41, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Kathleen Conway
Hi again. Can I ask whether you have a personal connection with Kathleen Conway? Cordless Larry (talk) 11:16, 15 October 2015 (UTC)--Kalina3112 (talk) 11:53, 16 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi Cordless Larry. I do have a personal connection with her. --Kalina3112 (talk) 11:08, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for getting back to me. In that case, you need to familiarise yourself with the information at Conflict of interest, and in particular the section on declaring your interest. Cordless Larry (talk) 11:09, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

talk Where do I need to add this? .
 * You should place that at Talk:Kathleen Conway. Cordless Larry (talk) 11:55, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

User talk: Cordless Larry Thank you! Am about to do so.--Kalina3112 (talk) 11:59, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks: By the way, linking to my talk page at the start of your comments serves no purpose. If you want me to receive a notification of your comment, place  or   somewhere in your comment. This will only work if you remember to sign your post, though. Cordless Larry (talk) 12:03, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Since you are being paid to edit, I also suggest having a read of Paid editing (essay) and disclosing this and any other articles that you are being paid to edit at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard. Sorry for all the bureaucracy! Cordless Larry (talk) 12:14, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Cordless Larry Sure. Thank you!--Kalina3112 (talk) 12:27, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for doing this, but you appear to have posted at Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard, rather than Conflict of interest/Noticeboard. Cordless Larry (talk) 12:54, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Cordless Larry I think I did also add it to the Noticeboard. I checked. --Kalina3112 (talk) 08:35, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
 * You have done now. Thanks! Cordless Larry (talk) 09:05, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kathleen Conway (November 7)
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikiisawesome was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kathleen Conway and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Kathleen_Conway Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Wikiisawesome&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Kathleen_Conway reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

/wia  /tlk  15:00, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Kathleen Conway has a new comment
<div style="border:solid 1px #9accf6;background:#f1f9ff;padding:1em;padding-top:0.5em;padding-bottom:1em;width:20em;color:black;margin-bottom: 1.5em;margin-left: 1.5em;width: 90%;"> I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kathleen Conway. Thanks! /wia  /tlk  12:35, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kathleen Conway (November 10)
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kathleen Conway and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Kathleen_Conway Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SwisterTwister&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Kathleen_Conway reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister  talk  08:55, 10 November 2015 (UTC) Cordless Larry Thank you. I know. We need to provide more references. --Kalina3112 (talk) 11:22, 10 November 2015 (UTC) Cordless Larry Yes, thank you. I did understand. --Kalina3112 (talk) 12:57, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks, SwisterTwister. Kalina3112, I note that this has been declined a few times now. The decline template suggests that the notability issue can be fixed by adding more citations to reliable sources discussing Kathleen Conway. However, I would like to point out that not all subjects meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines, and so no amount of searching will find sufficient sources about them. I'm not saying that this is definitely the case with Conway, but I think it is worth considering because I would hate for you to waste time searching for sources in vain. Cordless Larry (talk) 09:07, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
 * OK, so it's been declined twice. I thought it had been more times than that. Perhaps it is still possible to get the article accepted with more work, but I still think it's worth considering whether Conway meets the guidelines before proceeding. Cordless Larry (talk) 09:10, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, but my point was that some subjects don't have enough written about them for them to be considered notable according to Wikipedia's guidelines, and no amount of search for sources will change that. It might be that there are lots of sources out there about Conway, but don't assume that it's just a case of finding more references - there could be a more fundamental issue. Cordless Larry (talk) 11:59, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

License tagging for File:TheScott logo.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:TheScott logo.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:05, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Thank you! I added the tag. --Kalina3112 (talk) 17:18, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * You tagged the image as having a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License, but unfortunately the source website states that it is subject to copyright, so I have had to nominate it for deletion (see below). The image itself even features a copyright symbol! Cordless Larry (talk) 21:42, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

The author gave me the right to use it. Please take this tag for a day, so the author can send Wikipedia an e-mai.--Kalina3112 (talk) 07:49, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
 * The problem is that a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License gives anyone the right to use the logo anywhere, not just you here. In any case, I note that Diannaa has resolved the issue. Cordless Larry (talk) 09:02, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:TheScott logo.jpeg


A tag has been placed on File:TheScott logo.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cordless Larry (talk) 21:41, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of The Scott Treatment Des Concierge for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Scott Treatment Des Concierge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Scott Treatment Des Concierge until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cordless Larry (talk) 21:56, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Kalina3112. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Addiction Canada, you may have a conflict of interest. People with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, see the conflict of interest guideline and frequently asked questions for organizations. In particular, please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, its competitors, or projects and products you or they are involved with;
 * instead, propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the template);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing, and autobiographies. Thank you.  Mini  apolis  18:20, 5 December 2015 (UTC) Hi, yes. Thank you! I am familiar with the guidelines. However I have not been paid by Addiction Canada to upload this article. --Kalina3112 (talk) 10:38, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Whether you have been paid or not is immaterial. If you have a close connection to the subject of the article, you are strongly discouraged from editing the article and probably should not have created it. Many Wikipedians feel that conflict-of-interest editing has no place on Wikipedia.  Using Wikipedia for promotional purposes is not permitted, and those found to be using Wikipedia for promotion are likely to be blocked from editing. Please review the conflict of interest guideline. -- Rrburke (talk) 18:02, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TheScott logo.jpeg
 Thanks for uploading File:TheScott logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:50, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Kathleen Conway concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Kathleen Conway, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 22:30, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Kathleen Conway


Hello, Kalina3112. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Kathleen Conway".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.  Puffin  Let's talk! 09:46, 26 June 2016 (UTC)