User talk:Kalinparsonsgaming

Speedy deletion nomination of Stampylonghead


A tag has been placed on Stampylonghead, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(talk)  02:35, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Stampylonghead
Hello Kalinparsonsgaming,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Stampylonghead for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was previously deleted by a consensus decision.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vanjagenije (talk) 14:59, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

WP:ORE invite
—EncMstr (talk) 19:06, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lewelling, Milwaukie, Oregon
Hello, Kalinparsonsgaming. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Lewelling, Milwaukie, Oregon, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Crispulop (talk) 16:48, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Milwaukie neighborhoods
Template:Milwaukie neighborhoods has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Valfontis (talk) 00:52, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

January 2015
Hello, I'm Conifer. An edit that you recently made to Old Town/Chinatown MAX Station seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Conifer (talk ) 22:59, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of SE Tacoma/Johnson Creek for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SE Tacoma/Johnson Creek is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/SE Tacoma/Johnson Creek until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Conifer (talk ) 23:19, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Everett Backstrom


A tag has been placed on Everett Backstrom requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. smileguy91 Need to talk? 16:42, 28 February 2015 (UTC)