User talk:Kalli navya

Anterior pole moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Anterior pole, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. New articles generally need at least two (but preferably more) references from reliable sources that are independent of the subject that discuss the subject with significant coverage (trivial mentions do not contribute to notability).(See Rule 42) Information that can't be referenced to reliable sources should be removed from the draft because verifiability is necessary for information added to Wikipedia. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of  before the article title) where you can work on the article with minimal disruption from other users while you improve it. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready to be published, you can move it back to the article space yourself. However, I recommend that instead of moving it yourself that you follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template that I have added to the page. This submits the article to be reviewed by experienced editors that specialize in helping new editors write their first articles. —  InsertCleverPhraseHere (or here)  01:04, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anterior pole (August 28)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Krishna Chaitanya Velaga was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anterior pole and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 14:46, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. JNW (talk) 13:51, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

A belated welcome!


Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Kalli navya. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Questions, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Failosopher (talk) 12:14, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 12:16, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Food, you may be blocked from editing. Shellwood (talk) 12:51, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please read the Manual of Style pertaining to images at MOS:Images. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 04:40, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Edits to DNA
Hi, Kalli navya! I've reverted your image additions at DNA because I didn't believe there was sufficient context for them, and too many images can be quite distracting – see MOS:PERTINENCE. Images are useful in illustrating material within an article, but they should be used carefully! – Rhinopias (talk) 22:14, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Kalli navya. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Make A Difference, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the request edit template);
 * disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. GermanJoe (talk) 10:46, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Book spamming
Your addition of references to the World Book annual science supplement, 2012, in multiple articles constitutes book spamming. I am accordingly reverting all such insertions that have not already been reverted. Please do not spam references again. - Donald Albury 11:44, 3 June 2018 (UTC)