User talk:Kalpesh Manna 2002

Welcome!
Hi Kalpesh Manna 2002! I noticed your contributions to 2019–20 locust infestation&#32;and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! SUN EYE 1 07:03, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

2021 Western evacuation from Afghanistan
Many thanks for adding see alsos to this article. However WP does not add see alsos when it's relatively easy to read them in the first few paragraphs - when they're already linked. So I have had to remove them. Do feel free to reread the policy on See Alsos. Please feel free to contribute more to the article. Cheers Buckshot06 (talk) 17:28, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. I understood. Kalpesh Manna 2002 (talk) 06:02, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

January 2022
Hello, I'm Venkat TL. Your recent edit(s) to the page United Progressive Alliance appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Venkat TL (talk) 11:13, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

The alliance in Bihar has been disbanded as you agree so. And Secular Progressive Front in Manipur has no member party except Congress according to Wikipedia page. Kalpesh Manna 2002 (talk) 05:50, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

February 2022
Hello, I'm Kautilya3. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Belt and Road Initiative, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 13:19, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Changes had been made according to the map. Please look up. Kalpesh Manna 2002 (talk) 07:01, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 2022 German coup d'état plot into List of coups and coup attempts. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:41, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Offensive Guard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yurivka. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

July 2023
Hello, I'm JohnFromPinckney. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of international presidential trips made by Volodymyr Zelenskyy, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''If you have sources for these supposed trips (and I hope you do!) please add them. Otherwise, please don't re-add the unsupported claims to the article. &mdash; JohnFromPinckney (talk / edits)'' 20:00, 8 July 2023 (UTC)


 * There is a custom that information on list articles doesn't need sources immadiately. Next time add tag for a request for a citation. ThecentreCZ (talk) 09:16, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
 * That's a pretty wacky "custom", if it indeed exists. I've been here over 10 years and I have never heard such a claim. OTOH, I acquainted with the custom of adding any old stuff to an article, without any citation, and never coming back again. Either of these customs are in contravention of WP:CITE, however, so it's entirely appropriate to revert an unsourced addition (especially in case the editor is still around and can immediately add a good source while they're reverting my reversion). Tagging is rather a last resort, as the tags are too often ignored (sometimes for years).
 * In the case of my first reversion, the addition of SLO had occurred more than 24 hours previously, the additions of BUL, CZE and TUK were even from the day before that. Even if there were some special exemption for lists (and why would there be?), I don't think two days or even one day counts as "immediately".
 * And in any case, the thing to do when adding content is to get the sources first. After all, if you don't have the sources, how do you know what to add? Happy editing, both of you, &mdash; JohnFromPinckney (talk / edits) 13:13, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)