User talk:KalvinMcCrae93/sandbox

User talk:KalvinMcCrae93/sandbox Article Evaluation: Digital Divide In the article titled “Digital Divide,” everything was relevant. This article did not seem to have a particular bias. Because the article seemed unbiased, and it cited lots of different sources, it didn’t seem to overrepresent or underrepresent any particular point of viewMost of the links work and the sources support the claims in the article.Facts in the article seem to have appropriate references. The majority of the facts and the information come from reliable resources like MIT press and the United States Government.The information from the U.S government dates from 1995, more than 20 years ago The editors and viewers of the article are discussing how there should be more graphs. They also discuss how to properly cite the sources. There is no rating on the article and it is part of five WikiProjects.It gives more detail than discussed in class. KalvinMcCrae93 (talk) 04:17, 18 September 2017 (UTC)KalvinMcCrae93

Article Eval Canda Digital Divide LIS 2000
KalvinMcCrae93/sandbox/Article Eval Overall, the article was on topic through constantly stating Canada. The article is neutral, but there is a light bias towards government intervention. Yes,the ethic groups involved.The citations are adequate.Most of the information comes from Canada.There is nothing out of date, however there is missing evidence on the finacial factor in the digital divide in Canada.On the Talk page it appeared on front of the Wikipedia 'Did you know?'page. It is associated with Wikiprojects Canada. KalvinMcCrae93KalvinMcCrae93 (talk) 04:47, 18 September 2017 (UTC)