User talk:Kamal misra

Welcome !!

Please leave your comments with an appropriate subject and I'll revert.

Thank you...

Kamal (talk) 09:30, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:XIMB logo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:XIMB logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:21, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:XIMB logo.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:XIMB logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 16:01, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Ximb logo trans 1.0.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Ximb logo trans 1.0.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 16:08, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Note
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. - Max - You were saying? 06:29, 1 July 2008 (UTC)


 * User:Kamal misra, thank you for your detailed message. Find my replies below.
 * You seem to be offended by the title "Warning", so I have changed it to something that is hopefully more palatable to your sensitive tastes. However, just FYI, these standard templates are called "user warnings" on Wikipedia, so there is nothing "war cry"ish about them.
 * I am not putting a "watch on a single entry to purposefully denigrate it's existence". I have cleaned up literally dozens of so-called "articles" about schools, colleges and universities that were nothing but a copy of their marketing brochures in disguise. Rest assured that I have no prejudice against this particular institute, it came under my scanner during my regular rounds on Wikipedia.
 * With regard to PoV issues in Wikipedia articles, of course they exist. But that doesn't make them right, does it? And we should certainly not be considering them them as precendents that need to be followed. No one is saying that the Stanford University article is perfect, and the leading paragraph may suffer from some PoV, but I can point out the equally well-known Harvard University page, where the leading paragraph is phrased much better. You need to ask yourself whether you're being faithful to Wikipedia's editing principles if you cherry-pick articles with potential problems, and use them to defend problems in other articles.
 * A point to note is that words like "best", "biggest", "premier" are called peacock words. If such words are used by multiple, third-party, reliable sources, you should attribute them to the sources they came from, instead of synthesizing them from one's own conclusions.
 * And finally, contrary to what you think, Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia, not a "symbol of free expression". Kindly go through "What Wikipedia is not" for details. I don't know what you mean by "pseudo-control" and what it has to do with the "objective of this platform". The objective is to create a user-edited encyclopedia, and creating an encyclopedia requires following the 5 pillars of Wikipedia. It's that simple.
 * For your own benefit, please go through the links provided. They will, hopefully, clarify your doubts. Have a nice day. - Max - You were saying? 17:11, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Reply #2

 * User:Kamal misra, I have added the line about "biggest event" with attribution to The Financial Express to the Xpressions article.


 * However, I see significant issues with the tone used in the article's main body. I'm sorry to say this but it looks like the article has been written in a personal tone and reads somewhat like an essay for a school magazine than an encylopedia entry. I am noting some of the problems below (my comments are in red):
 * CeleblitZ is a much awaited event in Orissa - sources?
 * Decibelz is a celebration of the spirit of hard rock that abides in the young hearts of all B-school grads. It is a beacon for all upcoming rock bands, and is a forum where soulful music meets rebellion of the mind and hence nothing but genius flows. It defies all the logic that says that amateur bands cannot give a level of entertainment that can match those given by professionals. - requires trimming and rewording to be neutral and encyclopedic.
 * This is one of the most sought after events in the form of a mind-boggling fashion show, where participants walk the ramp amidst lots of colours, special effects and cheers. - requires rewording to be neutral and encyclopedic.
 * Elevating music, disco lights and low alcohol punches keep the participants captivated to the floor. Parties begin post midnight and run into the wee hours of morning, with the crowd just asking for more. Swing in to the rhythm or swing out to a beer, people let their hair down. - requires removal since the information is non-encyclopedic, and the tone is non-neutral.
 * An invitation to the alumnus to take a trip down the memory lane to those golden years that lost somewhere in the hustle bustle of everyday life. It is an opportunity for the alumnus to relive those magical moments on campus – to relive those long nights spent chatting outside the night mess, to meet those buddies who shared those days of fun and those nights of work, to relive those 'eventful' midnight birthday parties, to relive the JLTs and the block parties, and to sing the block anthem one more time to bring all those old memories rushing back. - same reason as above.
 * Apart from the sumptuous appetizers, there are ideas aplenty to satiate everyone….except the curious students - same reason as above.
 * Students invariably have found the interaction with Corporate honchos an enriching experience, because talking to experienced people who have a current perspective about the Industry provides them with invaluable inputs which mere books can never give! - requires removal since this is personal speculation.


 * In addition there are several other places that could do with a revamp. Since you are the article creator, I wanted to run this by you first. If you find that the observations are accurate and in keeping with Wikipedia's editorial policies (which you have read), please clean up the article. You can always get back to me in case you have any misgivings or doubts with what I have presented. - Max - You were saying? 14:43, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Reply #3

 * Hello Kamal misra, the article looks much better now. Thanks a lot for your co-operation and efforts. I hope that any misunderstandings we may have had previously are cleared now. Looking forward to more positive contributions from you, Max - You were saying? 15:00, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:XIMB Xpressions 07 Conclave.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:XIMB Xpressions 07 Conclave.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude ( talk ) 21:08, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:XIMB Xpressions Campus.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:XIMB Xpressions Campus.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude ( talk ) 21:08, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:XIMB Xpressions Fashion Show - 2.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:XIMB Xpressions Fashion Show - 2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude ( talk ) 21:09, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:XIMB Xpressions Fashion Show - 1.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:XIMB Xpressions Fashion Show - 1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude ( talk ) 21:09, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:XIMB New Academic Block.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:XIMB New Academic Block.JPG I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 21:11, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

NISER, IIT
Kamal - Thanks for editing the images in NISER, IITBN, and Education in Orissa. SDas (talk) 13:01, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Xpressions


A tag has been placed on Xpressions requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the importance of the subject,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. |\\ ~//| 06:19, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

-- UPDATE: Deleted. (Red-link)   |\\ ~//|  04:21, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Xavier Institute of Management, Bhubaneswar
Hi Kamal, thanks for adding references to Xavier Institute of Management, Bhubaneswar. I've removed the self-reference, which isn't needed anyway, but the Calcutta Telegraph is useful. (The text of the Telegraph article frankly seems completely promotional, too, but at least it is a third-party source.) Anyway, the template I'd put at the word "social contract" wasn't actually to ask for sources but for clarification of the strange use of the word Social contract. It's a concept in political philosophy, which doesn't normally refer to actual contracts at all. I see the Telegraph uses the term social contract, but you'll note that they put it in quote marks. That shows the journalist is aware it's used metaphorically or in an unusual sense. So, to clarify the usage, I've put the term in quote marks in our article too. With your link to the Telegraph, where the reader can look up where the phrase comes from, our use of it then becomes clear, I think. Thanks for helping, and happy editing! Bishonen &#124; talk 10:39, 2 September 2014 (UTC).

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:XIMB Xpressions 07 Conclave.jpg


The file File:XIMB Xpressions 07 Conclave.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:XIMB Xpressions Fashion Show - 1.jpg


The file File:XIMB Xpressions Fashion Show - 1.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "orphaned image, no encyclopedic use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:
 * File:XIMB Xpressions Fashion Show - 2.jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Entrance to XIMB.jpg


The file File:Entrance to XIMB.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused, low quality. Superseded by File:XIMB Entrance.JPG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 14:57, 1 December 2022 (UTC)