User talk:Kamatu

April 2014
Hello, I'm Flyer22. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Lewis's trilemma, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Flyer22 (talk) 05:26, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

February 2015
Hello, I'm Deunanknute. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to Robotech (role-playing game) have been reverted or removed because they could be seen to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Deunanknute (talk) 12:13, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Robotech, you may be blocked from editing. Deunanknute (talk) 01:21, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Deunanknute, thanks for finally getting a page. I would suggest that you get something else that references your ability to issue the threats you have made, because otherwise, you could just as well be a shill. As for your claims of "disruptive ending", that is totally an "In your opinion" position, especially since you have absolutely zero sourcing for a clear cut alternate. Without checking any of the sources or linked items, since I provide actual pictures showing the substandard quality issues referenced in the articles. Is there a Wiki Policy on whitewashing? I assume that after I dig up some of the third party sources that state the exact same thing, you will be going away, correct? Or will I have to do even more since pointing out that the smooth skinned red fruit is not the same as the rough skinned orange fruit appears to be against Wiki policy according to you.


 * What you have been posting is original research per WP:OR. If you can provide reliable, published sources along with your claims the information can be included. Deunanknute (talk) 20:42, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
Okay Deunanknute, took a few minutes since I had some free time for it and looked up the third party sources you "require" to stop your malicious edit reverting. Actually found a couple more items that I could not mention before because they weren't about as obvious as water is wet. I'll find it interesting to see if there is a reversion based on the sources not being "reliable" or "published".