User talk:Kamazeuci

Portal:LawOfTime
Howdy, it is probably not the best way to welcome someone to Wikipedia, however I wanted to let you know that I nominated the page you created Portal:LawOfTime for deletion. Wikipedia is not a good way to publish or promulgate original research. You are welcome to participate in the deletion discussion, Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:LawOfTime. Discussions usually last about a week, although they are sometimes closed before that. If you have any questions, feel free to leave a note on the bottom of my talk page, User_talk:TeaDrinker. Best wishes, --TeaDrinker 00:27, 10 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi Teadrinker, just received your msg because you thought the Law of Time portal is OR. Well, it isn't, it is a compendium of revolutionary science started by Jose Arguelles and continued by many. But I have no promotional interests, so, first I was thinking of hosting this at wikia or some other wiki farm, just chose Wikipedia because this is Public and Enciclopedic info, in order to avoid duplicates. Please tell me if you think it it shouldnt be in Wikipedia and I may move the project to Wikia. I just want to start the portal to make the initiative so other people from around the world start making articles about all the diverse subjetcs this science comprises. Thank you very much.
 * --Kamazeuci 00:45, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the message. I am not familiar enough with Wikia projects to give any useful advice about it.  Wikipedia is perhaps the best known Wiki project, however it has some pretty restrictive about what can go into it.  While it is a place for documenting existing knowledge, there are several things to consider.  Articles are a good place for documenting existing knowledge (published in reliable sources), however it is not really a place to host a project on expanding this knowledge or documenting generally unknown technical aspects of it.  A reference on what material Wikipedia usually uses is (the somewhat unfortunately titled) Fringe theories.  Rarely are the technical aspects of science outside of the mainstream documented on Wikipedia, because are not covered in third party sources.
 * My feeling is that Wikipedia is not really what you're looking for, and the content is not really what Wikipedia does. But we'll see what other people think.  Best wishes, --TeaDrinker 01:12, 10 July 2007 (UTC)