User talk:Kambodja

WikiProject Systems and Category:Systems appeal
Many thanks for your support re Category:Systems. Following the deletion, Mdd has initiated a WikiProject Systems. If you would like to participate and support it, do add your name under WikiProject_Systems.

In addition, I'm trying for an appeal for Category:Systems — see Deletion_review/Log/2007_April_20 — we can see what happens anyway, but do add to the discussion! Procedure and following guidelines seems to be important for success, so do read the guidelines on overcategorization and add comments in the light of this if you wish. Best regards, Jonathan Bowen 18:08, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

September 2019
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to White genocide conspiracy theory. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 19:02, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I just add a couple of words to equalise this ridiculously tendentious and biased text. This is an encyclopaedia and not an anti-trumpists and leftists brochure. Just pretend that the article about Theory of Evolution someone will edit in this way:"This is the myth, based on false fear of God and came from satan worshipper Charles "The ugly beard" Darwin". Notwithstanding the article about White Genocide Theory edited exactly this way. Kambodja (talk) 19:41, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Which sources supporting the theory do you think are most reliable? EllenCT (talk) 01:35, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Its not my field of competence. But I'm able to distinguish normal, neutral wikipedian style of text, and a trotskism-style brochure, blaming rights in every sin on Earth. How its possible, that in the world where mayor of London is pakistanian muslim - the article about white genocide starts from non-alternative word "myth"? And what a nonsense, what a ridiculous statement, that the author of this concept is "convicted felon" and so on? Later in the article there are many names of politics and scientists (also mentioned in non-complimentary style) but on 1st place some criminal have been put. Its manipulation and orwellianism. Kambodja (talk) 19:03, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
 * There are literally dozens of scholarly publications and news articles which meet Wikipedia's reliable source criteria that call white genocide a myth. The race of an elected officeholder doesn't have anything to do with whether genocide is taking place; when whites were in charge of South Africa's government, blacks rightly complained about apartheid, but not genocide. It would have hurt their cause to have done so. The instances of genocide documented throughout history have almost entirely been against victims with the same skin color as the perpetrators. I happen to agree with you that David Lane didn't have as much to do with the popularization as other editors seem to think, but when a string of mass murderers all hold to a fringe idea, those championing the idea aren't likely to have the details of their notoriety downplayed. I'm still interested in learning where you heard about the theory and what has convinced you of it. EllenCT (talk) 09:33, 6 September 2019 (UTC)