User talk:Kamil24

Welcome

 * }

June 2012
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Carly Rae Jepsen discography does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Till I Go Home talk  stalk 08:47, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 23
Hi. When you recently edited Kristina Maria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Corneille (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:03, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

WP:BADCHARTS
Please do not add information from the United World Chart (mediatraffic.de), or any other chart listed at WP:BADCHARTS, to any any Wikipedia articles. Thank you.&mdash;Kww(talk) 05:12, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
 * If you do this again, you will be blocked from editing. Do not add information from charts listed at WP:BADCHARTS to any Wikipedia articles.&mdash;Kww(talk) 21:40, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

March 2013
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Carly Rae Jepsen discography, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.  — Statυs  ( talk,  contribs ) 03:37, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Edit Warring
Your recent editing history at Carly Rae Jepsen discography shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)