User talk:Kamran Hassan

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes. If you intend to edit constructively in other topic areas, you may be granted the right to continue under a change of username. Please read the following carefully.

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, website or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.
 * Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Probably not, although if you can demonstrate a pattern of future editing in strict accordance with our neutral point of view policy, you may be granted this right. See Wikipedia's FAQ for Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again.
 * Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?


 * What can I do now?

If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you may consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead. If you do intend to make useful contributions here about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:


 * Add the text on your user talk page.
 * Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
 * Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  14:37, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Your draft
It's now at User:Texaco(novel)/Texaco (novel), and will move to User:Your new username/Texaco (novel) after your rename request is completed. First the good stuff; this is a very thorough draft which clearly shows that the book meets Wikipedia's inclusion criteria for books. It's comprehensive and contains lots of useful encyclopedia information. You don't need to do a great deal to get it ready for mainspace, but here are the major sticking points: If you can address these two issues, you have a decent article on your hands - I've added a template to the top of the draft which you can use to submit it when you feel it's ready. One other thing - I've removed the image of the novel's cover temporarily, because it's been uploaded under the wrong licence - until the licencing is fixed, please don't use it. If you need help, feel free to ask on my talkpage or at the Teahouse, or just ask your question here and place the code  above it. Yunshui 雲 ‍ 水  15:30, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Promotional language - statements like "illuminates the truths of his homeland by delicately intertwining both historical and personal perspectives" are far too flowery for an encyclopedia. You need to go through the draft and look for peacock or weasel words that may have crept in, and rephrase those sections to make them more neutral. You can say that the novel has been widely praised, but you need to provide a source that specifically says, "this novel has been widely praised". Which leads me to:
 * Sourcing - there's a good deal of analysis here, but much of it is not sourced. That makes it original research, something Wikipedia doesn't like. If you want to write about metonymic gaps of double colonisation, you can - but only if someone else has done so first, and you reference their work. Your own analysis and opinions don't belong here. Have a read of the verifiability policy to get an idea of what sort of things need sources.

Hi, Yunshui, thank you so much for your help. We have updated a few things. We have to present in a few minutes, if I hit submit will the page go under review, and possible be rejected? I know that the "promotional" language needs to be addressed, and if we do remove it, i believe that will help us satisfy the sourcing "sticking" point you have addressed.
 * I wouldn't expect it to be rejected if submitted, though it does depend a bit on who you get as a reviewer. Review can take a few weeks, though. I hope your presentation went well; sorry I didn't see this until today. Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  08:41, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Image
I've listed the book's cover image for deletion on Wikimedia Commons, since it can't be used under a CC-BY-SA licence. When you've got the article up, let me know and I'll upload it for you under fair use (I can't do that until there is an article to use it in). Yunshui 雲 ‍ 水  15:45, 9 December 2013 (UTC)