User talk:Kamrul512

April 2013
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of aircraft of the Pakistan Air Force. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Faizan  -  Let's talk!   16:20, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pakistan Army, you may be blocked from editing. Faizan  -  Let's talk!   16:20, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Faizan  -  Let's talk!   07:58, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

WP:RS
Regarding your edits here, you edited and disrupted the order at the list, you changed the number of aircrafts, accessories, etc without WP:RS, please be careful of it. Little Cobra (talk) 08:05, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

April 2013
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Mil Mi-17, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Thomas.W (talk) 13:18, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Disruptive Edits (Warning)
It has been observed that you are making disruptive edits on many Wikipedia pages as recently you did to List of aircraft of the Pakistan Air Force. You are requested avoid such edits. You cannot remove properly sourced content from Wikipedia articles, subject to the condition that you are improving/updating it accompanied with a proper citation.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at the above mentioned page, you may be blocked from editing.

You are also requested to briefly describe the changes you have done on Wikipedia pages, especially when you are making major edits.

You may need to read WP:REF about how to craft references for Wikipedia articles.

If you need any help, type at the bottom of this page. Cheers ... --Maxx786 (talk) 11:08, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

April 2013
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to List of ships of the Bangladesh Navy. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thomas.W (talk) 11:25, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

May 2013
This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Bangladesh Navy, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Thomas.W (talk) 11:30, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of ships of the Bangladesh Navy, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Facebook is not a reliable source. Thomas.W (talk) 11:54, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Ways to improve BNS Tista
Hi, I'm Gbawden. Kamrul512, thanks for creating BNS Tista!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please provide at least 1 reference for all articles

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Gbawden (talk) 10:05, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Durjoy Class, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stealth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Vandalism on Myanmar Navy Page
If you keep on vandalising the page, we have no choice but to take appropriate action in the future. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thihazaw88 (talk • contribs) 09:23, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

July 2013
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Myanmar Navy. Your edits appear to constitute possible vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Thihazaw88 (talk) 11:31, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Thihazaw88. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Aung Zeya-class frigate because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Thihazaw88 (talk) 15:49, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

August 2013
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Aung Zeya-class frigate. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Thihazaw88 (talk) 07:23, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Answer about Myanmar Navy's Kh-35
You have posted on my page about Myanmar Navy. Here is my answer. Check this link [|here]. If you have some knowledge about military hardware, you might find your answer there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thihazaw88 (talk • contribs) 07:32, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did to BTR-80, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ''Armstrade/Sipri does not agree with your source, and Sipri is more reliable. Changing the number of BTR-80 used by Hungary, without providing a reliable source for the lower number, is also something you deserve a warning for.'' Thomas.W   talk to me  17:48, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

October 2013
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Bangladesh Air Force, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ''Do not add unsourced material to the article. Considering the number of warnings you have been given for it you ought to know by now that unsourced edits will be removed.'' Thomas.W   talk to me  15:22, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. My name is not dave (talk/contribs) 15:53, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Bangladesh Air Force, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Thomas.W  talk to me  16:05, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 16:31, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rubin (radar)


A tag has been placed on Rubin (radar) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://toad-design.com/migalley/index.php/jet-aircraft/mig29/mig29-n019-radar/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Diannaa (talk) 02:13, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)