User talk:KamrynGuaraca

February 2020
Hello, I'm Dartslilly. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Extinction—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Dartslilly (talk) 04:07, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 7)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:KamrynGuaraca/sandbox Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This draft does not make a credible claim of significance. This draft would be subject to speedy deletion in article space. If this draft is resubmitted in its current form or a similar form, it should be nominated for deletion.

This does not appear to be a Wikipedia draft.

This draft reads like a social media profile, but Wikipedia is not a social medium. This draft does not establish biographical notability.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:55, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 06:16, 7 February 2020 (UTC)