User talk:Kamujin

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. --98.204.112.111 (talk) 04:19, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

January 2008
You have been blocked from editing for in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below.

While, I am clearly not an experienced editor of wiki, I had tried to show the problems with the entry as it was worded. I added notes to the discussion section. I also added a cited entry to improve the quality of the page. User --98.204.112.111 reverted my edits with not much more then a complaint about my poor choice of the phrase "It should be noted".
 * I don't have a problem with the block being lifted, but I have issues with Kamujin's characterization of my edits. My problems were hardly just about the wording, and I specifically explained to the user that the reverts were reintroducing typos and vandalism, while erasing good faith edits. And I don't like my good faith attempts to clean up the article is described as "vandalism". 98.204.112.111 (talk) 05:18, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Wait a second, why is this user, who did not break 3RR, blocked, with the IP, which did break 3RR is unblocked? The Evil Spartan (talk) 22:00, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the help. I will try to discuss the matter in the talk section. Kamujin (talk) 22:51, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Hello,

I have recently edited the Rob_Enderle bio page and see that you have been involved in a past critique of the page. I figured you might want to review the edits to ensure conformance with npov and bio policies. I'd rather have _somebody_ look sooner than later.

--kop (talk) 16:30, 2 April 2010 (UTC)