User talk:KanaT1990

August 2019
Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Fatal Attraction, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. Categories must also be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 17:24, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Nikola Tesla, you may be blocked from editing without further warnings. Thank you, - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 16:31, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

I see that you added category "Category:People with narcissistic personality disorder" to Andrew Bolt and Sam Newman. These are BLPs. You are causing other editors to spend time cleaning up after your psychiatric diagnoses. Peter Gulutzan (talk) 14:17, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Serbian futurologists


A tag has been placed on Category:Serbian futurologists requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:32, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Overcategorization
Please read Overcategorization and Overcategorization before you continue adding so many categories to articles. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 17:18, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Mysteries category
I have reverted your addition of to pages on my watchlist because our article categorization guidelines call for us to use the most specific category possible (with the exception of "distinguished subcategories", which doesn't apply here.

"Mysteries" has as a subcategory, which in turn has as a subcategory. That subcategory is further divided into cases by country and decade, into which the Sodder and Joan Risch (as well as all our other articles about notable missing-person cases) are categorized. Therefore you don't need to add that top-level category.

With this in mind, it would be beneficial to your reputation here if you went back over all your recent edits and reverted that change anywhere you made it. If you continue to just do this and edit war to keep this, you are risking getting blocked. Daniel Case (talk) 17:22, 1 October 2019 (UTC)


 * , please stop repeatedly adding redundant categories immediately. This has already been explained to you by Daniel Case and others. Your editing is WP:DISRUPTIVE. Thank you. – Wallyfromdilbert (talk) 21:31, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

October 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Sam Harris. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 16:15, 4 October 2019 (UTC)


 * KanaT1990 (talk) 16:18, 4 October 2019 (UTC)How so? I was editing.  Don't understand, sorry.
 * You are adding large numbers of categories to many articles. Many of these categories are unsupported by the articles, which is original research. Many of the are general categories, where a more specific sub-category is already on the article. You have been warned about this multiple times by multiple editors already. It is disruptive. Stop doing it. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 16:21, 4 October 2019 (UTC)