User talk:Kana Darkak

Proposed deletion of Khan Bahadur Abdul Halim Chowdhury


The article Khan Bahadur Abdul Halim Chowdhury has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Notability not demonstrated by sources here nor does it seem likely based on an external search. Improperly sourced to banglapedia.org. Seems to be trying to inherit notability from notable children."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  &mdash; jmcgnh  (talk) (contribs)  14:32, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Jowhorunnesa moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Jowhorunnesa, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dhakapattys


A tag has been placed on Dhakapattys requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://en.banglapedia.org/index.php?title=Dhakapattys. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pontificalibus (talk) 09:41, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Shamsun Nahar Khan for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shamsun Nahar Khan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Shamsun Nahar Khan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Worldbruce (talk) 21:37, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of The Influential Muslims of 16th Century


The article List of The Influential Muslims of 16th Century has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unreferenced original research. There's no indication these people were 'influential', which is a highly subjective criterion anyway, unsuitable for an encyclopedia. Also, there's no indication these are the influential Muslims of the 16th century; there were plenty more not listed here."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Huon (talk) 19:38, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Jowhorunnesa concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Jowhorunnesa, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of influential Muslims of the 16th Century


The article List of influential Muslims of the 16th Century has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The inclusion criteria are so vague that the list is useless. In effect this is an (unsourced) indiscriminate collection of names."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Huon (talk) 09:47, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of List of influential Muslims of the 16th Century for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of influential Muslims of the 16th Century is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of influential Muslims of the 16th Century until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ajf773 (talk) 09:32, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Azimuddin Ahmed


The article Azimuddin Ahmed has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "fails WP:GNG. Does not meet the guidelines of notability. Citations merely note that he was the grandfather of a notable person."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dead.rabbit (talk) 01:53, 22 June 2019 (UTC)