User talk:Kanbam

December 2023
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you may be blocked from editing.  Acroterion   (talk)   23:45, 16 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Please show me how my changes are incorrect. Kanbam (talk) 23:51, 16 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia is not a congenial host for fringe medicine advocacy. This is your only warning.  Acroterion   (talk)   23:53, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia has been prompting me for donations. There IS controversial information on Wikipedia that clearly goes along with the government narrative which has been captured by Big Pharma. There are no two ways about it. If you choose to publish incorrect information that benefits Big Pharma, then get your donations from them, and I will list Wikipedia as just one more source of propaganda. It's a shame, because until now, I loved Wikipedia. Now I can't trust it anymore. :(
 * There is plenty of data out there that supports my claims about Ivermectin. I would think you might have one of your researchers at least follow it up, in the interest of truth. Kanbam (talk) 23:59, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately you've been sucked into believing bullshit. See Ivermectin during the COVID-19 pandemic if you want to get the science & start some self-improvement; otherwise, if you continue trying to insert the bullshit into Wikipedia you will get blocked as it wastes everybody's time. Bon courage (talk) 04:20, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Wow, I must say I'm now even more disappointed in Wikipedia... that you would write something insulting to a person using your service, particularly one who has previously donated to Wikipedia. Kanbam (talk) 05:07, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
 * No insult, you're probably more a victim. What's deeply ironic about all this is that it's coming to light that behind the fraudulent ivermectin research were ... ivermectin manufacturers - the very 'Big Pharma' that ivermectin believers think they are combatting. Bon courage (talk) 08:10, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
 * That makes sense as Ivm is no longer under patent. Pharma wants to make their money in the new mRNA vaccine. I'm sure you know mRNA technology has been researched for decades, yet the only product on the market had to use EUA to get there. Here's another eye-opener for you. If you look on the FDA websites you should be able to find the vaccine inserts that come with every vaccine vial. (For covid they are blank btw.) In section 6.1 manufacturers are required to describe their clinical trial data. You will see that nearly all vaccines are NOT tested against an inert placebo. The "Control Arm" of the vaccine trials are given another vaccine or some subset of the adjuvants (instead of a saline placebo), thus obscuring any potential safety signals. The reason they can get away with this is because of the 1986 Vaccine act where the US Govt took on liability for them.
 * Thanks for speaking with me in a more cordial manner. I appreciate your engagement. 139.218.131.49 (talk) 05:59, 19 December 2023 (UTC)