User talk:Kands1876

Welcome!
Hello, Kands1876, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --Animalparty! (talk) 18:11, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Note on errors
Hi there. I notice you've been addressing factual errors by explicitly mentioning them in article, e.g. here and here. While factual errors should be corrected, it is best to simply remove or correct the errors, rather than add additional meta-information about them. You could also raise suspected errors on the respective article talk page(s). In the case of Eugene Zimmerman, the incorrect image has been replaced. In the case of Henry Louis Stephens, I've reverted your additions pending better verification. You should be careful of not publishing original or unverifiable research (see WP:OR): You state "Lewis" is the correct middle name, alluding to his baptismal and marriage records. In order for this to be verifiable, you must state where these records can be located, either electronically or physically. Furthermore, if the majority of reliable sources use "Louis", (including secondary sources and Stephens' own works), then Wikipedia should use that spelling, unless or until there is compelling evidence to the contrary. If in fact Lewis is the real name but seldom or never used, then a less intrusive solution might be to add an explanatory footnote (see Efn for instance) rather than boldly assert as such in the introduction. Cheers, --Animalparty! (talk) 23:35, 9 May 2016 (UTC)