User talk:Kanelboller05

Hey Kathi, I'm sorry I've taken so long to reply to your proposal, but I happily accept my share of the work (ahead). Christoph — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vergil70 (talk • contribs) 16:20, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Aktion Mensch


A tag has been placed on Aktion Mensch, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Theroadislong (talk) 19:17, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Welcome
Willkommen, Kanelboller05. I noticed that your translation of Aktion Mensch is up for deletion. Can you find any other third-party sources (German or English) to verify the content of this article?

One of the requirements on English Wikipedia is that the content of articles is verifiable by citing multiple reliable sources that are independent of the organization itself. I'm not sure what the rules are at the German Wikipedia, but I imagine that they are similar. Unfortunately it appears that the original article in German cites only the organization's own website.

In your translated version here, I see you have cited one source (https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_gg/englisch_gg.html#p0033/) that is independent, but I don't think that is enough to pass English Wikipedia's notability criteria for organizations. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 02:18, 11 January 2018 (UTC)