User talk:Kanishq Tonger

June 2020
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Gurjara-Pratihara dynasty, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 07:52, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Gurjara-Pratihara dynasty. Alivardi  (talk)  10:15, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Unsourced/disruptive edits
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 17:10, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

July 2020
Hello, I'm CommanderWaterford. I noticed that you recently removed content from Chavda dynasty without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:15, 1 July 2020 (UTC)