User talk:Kante4/Archive 17

Why are you removing personal data sections?
Why have you removed the personal data sections in instances such as these 1, 2, 3, 4? These edits do not appear constructive. If there is a certain Wikipedia guideline that states that these personal data sections should be removed please tell me. Thanks. Inter&#38;anthro (talk) 18:08, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Leicester Squad template
Why did you remove Kramaric? he hasn't been sold just a loan so should only have been hidden. Jimmy Skitz's Answer Machine 15:40, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Reference in page "2016 Asian Men's Handball Championship"
Hello, Kante4.

Page 2016 Asian Men's Handball Championship. Section "Reference". There wrote: "Draw 16th Asian Men's Championships". This text about past Championship. Now 17th. I didn't found right link. Can you change this reference? GAV80 (talk) 16:20, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi
If you want to, please take a look at the article about Jovan Radomir. Any help is appreciated.--BabbaQ (talk) 10:14, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

iihf
Damn, one of these times I will leave you nothing to correct.18abruce (talk) 13:07, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Wasn't sure how to differentiate the forward Maria Meza from the goalie, hope what I did works for now. And how annoying is it that the ticker is wrong on two or three goals per game?18abruce (talk) 17:52, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Speed skating
Thanks for creating all the great pages of the 2016 World Single Distance Speed Skating Championships! (As always :-) )! I don't have time this weekend, but I will create the nations pages. Thanks! Sander.v.Ginkel (Talk) 14:00, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Clarification
Hi there KANTE, from Portugal,

remember this WP:FOOTY report (please see here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football/Archive_100#Cristiano_Ronaldo), where you gave your opinion? Well, just to clarify I have nothing in particular against Real Madrid (I support no club at all, not even the Portuguese national team, I have some sympathy for Athletic Bilbao but that is all), no sir. However, in spite of my nationality, I have to say I don't like Mr. Ronaldo's behaviour on the pitch (and overall) one bit. A terrific athlete and goalscorer, but that's it in my opinion. I was looking to see if it was worth mentioning in his article, but before you ask, I think situations like these should be mentioned in ALL sportspeople's article, not just Ronaldo's.

Best wishes to you, alles gut and happy editing --84.90.219.128 (talk) 16:25, 16 February 2016 (UTC)


 * I agree 100% --84.90.219.128 (talk) 16:40, 16 February 2016 (UTC).

for one or two goalscorers
Hello, Kante4. I want ask one question for you. Why you delete for one or two goalscorers? GAV80 (talk) 21:01, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

I think that need add for all number of goalscorers because it is easy do edit for other users: need only move goalscorers from one number of goals to other number of goals, without adding new  if change from 1 or 2 to other number of goals. GAV80 (talk) 21:13, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

But there is a difference for two goalscorers. If with then 2 columns, if without  then only one column. GAV80 (talk) 21:31, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Let's ask other users what they think about it. GAV80 (talk) 21:36, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

2016 IIHF World Championship Division III scoring list
Hey. I noticed that you changed the scoring list I added for the tournament to one that is slightly different. I copied the one used for the 2016 World Junior Ice Hockey Championships, seeing as how it both has the rankings for the various players and is more compacted and just looks better overall in my opinion. There any reason why you changed that to the current one? I personally find that knowing the actual place of the players is kind of more relevant than what position they are (as most all are forwards), and the compactness and links to their national teams seems better to have. And in general having one standard format for the various tournaments seems like a logical thing to do. Kaiser matias (talk) 20:02, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I did take a look at some others, and that's why I note there's more than one style used, and feel it should be standardized. I don't really see the relevance of noting position, as like I said almost all are forwards (its now moved up to two defenceman for today). And I would not say I'm the only one going for alternative styles considering, like I said, I copied one from the World Juniors article, which I did not create. I still feel noting the respective players place is relevant, which all these omit for some reason. Kaiser matias (talk) 20:59, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

div II
no, once the tie is broken by POL and the other two are still tied you start over again, so KOR win over GBR decides it. 18abruce (talk) 13:50, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Which is what you said I guess, sorry. I am at work and looked quickly, thank you for keeping up all the tournaments.18abruce (talk) 18:24, 8 April 2016 (UTC)


 * I believe I have caused you some edit conflicts this morning, sorry about that.18abruce (talk) 14:27, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Bale
Game still on but Bale has been changed. Please, think before doing something. Wolfgang (talk) 15:44, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
 * It doesn't have sense, but you want this. Wolfgang (talk) 15:58, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Sick rules, but OK. Wolfgang (talk) 16:05, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

promotion-relegation rules
Have you read this? It says that if Germany and France finish 7th and 8th in their group this year then only one team will be relegated, and only one team will be promoted from Division I. Took me by surprise.18abruce (talk) 22:26, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes the is no chance Hungary finishes above both of them, be a huge celebration if they win one game I think.18abruce (talk) 14:46, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Brackets
Hi, I just saw that in the olypic articles you updated you used the "new" round module instead of older seeding templates. I was just wondering if this should be done everywhere for consistency, or if we should use the older version which included team seeding. For example your version, versus the old version with seeding. Let me know what you think. Qed237&#160;(talk) 16:23, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, agreed. Lets go with the new version. My main goal is consistency. Also I have been adding tables and brackets to the main sports articles. I think some information should exists there (not details such as matches though). Qed237&#160;(talk) 16:43, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Just have a question out of curiosity. When I was looking to create a new submodule to Module:Sports table to use for Volleyball (see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Volleyball where I have examples of how it currently looks), I spotted something else. At Volleyball at the 2016 Summer Olympics – Men's tournament we have match templates for the matches, while at Volleyball at the 2016 Summer Olympics – Women's tournament we only have at wikitable for showing results. Why the difference between genders? Should we not have same at both? Also Is there something that exists in the match-templates that does not exists in the wikitable, except referee and attendance? They both seems to show very similar information which is the set-by-set result. Perhaps both should have the wikitable and then individual group and knockout stage articles with the matches just like football? <i style="font-family:Sans-serif"><b style="color:blue">Qed</b><b style="color:red">237</b>&#160;<b style="color:green">(talk)</b></i> 14:12, 27 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Also, why list a new set on a new row and not do it like hockey or other sports that has parts in parenthesis. Compare Template:Volleyballbox with Template:IceHockeybox which looks much cleaner. <i style="font-family:Sans-serif"><b style="color:blue">Qed</b><b style="color:red">237</b>&#160;<b style="color:green">(talk)</b></i> 14:16, 27 April 2016 (UTC)


 * I have no problem with that, but wouldn't it be better then to use the matchtemplate like the hockeytemplate instead of making new rows that does not contain much info. <i style="font-family:Sans-serif"><b style="color:blue">Qed</b><b style="color:red">237</b>&#160;<b style="color:green">(talk)</b></i> 14:26, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

A bunch of questions now, sorry. This should be the last one for a while. I saw you used Template:dts for the dates in Template:2016 Summer Olympics men's field hockey game A1 while in footballboxes in diferent competitions I have seen Template:Start date being introduced instead. Is not "Start date"-template more appropriate in this case? If so, how to we do with the passed variable? <i style="font-family:Sans-serif"><b style="color:blue">Qed</b><b style="color:red">237</b>&#160;<b style="color:green">(talk)</b></i> 15:53, 27 April 2016 (UTC)


 * I am just not sure how to adjust the passed variable as it is y or yes in Template:Start date for dates first (should be default), while nothing should be passed to df when the df in Template:2016 Summer Olympics men's field hockey game A1 is set to "mdy". <i style="font-family:Sans-serif"><b style="color:blue">Qed</b><b style="color:red">237</b>&#160;<b style="color:green">(talk)</b></i> 19:49, 27 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Okay, I made a "hack" now with an ifeq-statement. If the matchtemplate is called with mdy it displays "August 6, 2016" otherwise "6 August 2016". This is the only two formats in Template:Start date, but should be enough. <i style="font-family:Sans-serif"><b style="color:blue">Qed</b><b style="color:red">237</b>&#160;<b style="color:green">(talk)</b></i> 22:16, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

I think you might be interested in User talk:Qed237. <i style="font-family:Sans-serif"><b style="color:blue">Qed</b><b style="color:red">237</b>&#160;<b style="color:green">(talk)</b></i> 09:49, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Medal template
What is you opinion about using this template for club competitions? Osplace 02:59, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I think it started a couple of years ago, and I reverted some edits and talk about with two users. But this Daria Polonia is taking everything apart. He wants everything like he wants in his way, like they do in his home wiki. Osplace 15:38, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Ownership is his principal mistake. But he also works in his own world. Is very strange he is replying group conversations. Everything should be discussed in an open way. I will start the medal template discussion. Osplace 15:43, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * What about this: awesome! Osplace 15:56, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * They are common in football, thats why. I had removed a lot of them after the warning, because the warning stated that may be subject to deletion. Someone change it. I would vote to delete all of them. --Osplace 16:01, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Handball draw
Woww!! This is impressive! How did you know the correct handball draw for the Summer Olympics on 26 April (see here) while the draw was today on 29 April (official announcement)! Sander.v.Ginkel (Talk) 19:40, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Ahh, of course..! Stupid thinking of me.. :) Sorry Sander.v.Ginkel (Talk) 19:48, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Discussion on Real Madrid page
Serial disruptive editor ignoring everything I've said. I've no issue when consensus is reached in talkpage, this user isn't interested in consensus. Mourinho (who was chased out the door with just one la liga) is being promoted in the Real Madrid article way above what he warrants. Far more notable figures (such as Del Bosque) havent been mentioned. Have a look in talk and give your own view on this. Carlos Rojas77 (talk) 13:47, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

iihf reports
I really don't know what is happening, some of the 'stats' links didn't connect to anything. I was just trying to get a link that worked but I think I may have messed up, I don't know.18abruce (talk) 20:15, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I will try, but I am working a lot, and if the raptors go game seven I will be gone all day on sunday.18abruce (talk) 20:13, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Martin Heuberger


The article Martin Heuberger has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Omni Flames  let's talk about it  09:41, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Álvaro Arbeloa
I see, sorry for the mistake. Happy editing, from Portugal --Be Quiet AL (talk) 19:03, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Fürth template
When changing a template like the Template:Fb team Fürth it's a good idea to check first in what articles it is used in. The specific one is for season articles before the clubs name change and merger with TSV Vestenbergsgreuth in 1996. Template:Fb team Greuther Fürth exists for the seasons after the merger and was used in, for example, 2015–16 2. Bundesliga article. I've made the necessary changes in 2016–17 2. Bundesliga. Regards, Calistemon (talk) 00:13, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Templates
According to who? APM (talk) 17:19, 31 May 2016 (UTC)AmorPatiturMoras
 * Maybe so, but it's an ugly mess and I've only ever seen it used for footballers playing for bigger clubs such as Barcelona, Real Madrid and Bayern Munich... APM (talk) 19:01, 31 May 2016 (UTC)AmorPatiturMoras

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey
The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.
 * Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Spain
Would not spain women's national football already classified mathematically for Euro2017? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.172.65.201 (talk) 21:45, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Yes, but it could be at least the fifth best runner-up => — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.172.65.201 (talk) 06:18, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

About Croatia in 2016 European Women's Handball Championship qualification
Hello, Kante4. Please, read EHF. There is written "the Croatians also clinched their berth to Sweden." Is it right? Or for third-ranked team matches with fourth-placed teams don't count? GAV80 (talk) 10:24, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

2016 FIBA U-17 World Championship edits
1)Regarding your recent edits, I undid the changes you made. I think the way you changed it to makes it not as organized and more cluttered. Having four brackets consecutively like you had it makes it look very chaotic in my opinion. With all those classification games having to be played, I think its just easier to make a winning braket/loser bracket, given that the classification games really aren't that important, so why not group them all together and make it more organized? I appreciate your edits though, keep up the good work!

2)It does make sense when its as simple and binary as Winning bracket and Losing bracket. But okay, I'll change it to where there in chronological order: R16 bracket>R16>9th-16th classification>QF>5th-8th classification>SF>Final classification games>3rd place>Final

2016 FIBA OQT for Women
Where are you finding the attendance for these games? Just curious, cause I can't find it anywhere on the FIBA website.

Standards for International Basketball Competitions
Is there something in the standards for international basketball competitions about not editing in known information, such as the W-L record of the team in a certain placement, until the games are completed?

No. BLR is currently 1–2. They lost to KOR and CHN.

Nomination of Martin Heuberger for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Martin Heuberger is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Martin Heuberger until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tvx1 12:13, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Fábio Coentrão
Hi there KANTE, from Portugal (we have met before but with my anon IP and a former account),

I don't think this guy should have the 2016 UEFA Super Cup honour, he was not even in squad. Same for Pepe, Bale, Ronaldo and Kroos. However, I am not going to remove anything, just pointing it out.

Continue the great work, cheers --Be Quiet AL (talk) 14:22, 10 August 2016 (UTC)


 * I am not that all convinced, I am going to start a WP:FOOTY discussion, let's see how that turns out. --Be Quiet AL (talk) 14:52, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

According to practically all the opinions at the discussion, I think honour needs to go (someone mentioned there that Bale, Kroos and Navas were included in the official squad despite not travelling, but only those three players), but I will not remove anything out of respect for your work, I leave it to your judgement. --Be Quiet AL (talk) 20:54, 10 August 2016 (UTC)


 * So, you think they should stay in spite of the feedback? Fair enough. --Be Quiet AL (talk) 14:28, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

I understand you completely, but fortunately (or unfortunately), opinions change like the wind here on WP:FOOTY, and right now more people seem to be opposed to the inclusion. But don't worry I repeat it, I won't remove anything. --Be Quiet AL (talk) 14:56, 11 August 2016 (UTC)


 * You can embrace WP:BOLD and remove it yourself, I will not do it because it would seem disrespectful towards your work. The only player from Madrid that I edit regularly that has the wrong honour is Coentrão, the others I have never edited in ten years (Bale, Ronaldo, Kroos) or have edited regularly but have already "abandoned" them (Pepe, Ramos, Navas). --Be Quiet AL (talk) 15:24, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Now, I am getting the same crap in Álvaro Morata, regarding the 2015 Supercoppa Italiana (he was injured, as reference #33 explains us). If the user - which I have messaged - reverts me again, screw it, I leave the (wrong) honour be! --Be Quiet AL (talk) 21:03, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Men's Field Hockey at Rio
India has also advanced from Group B to Quarterfinals because Ireland takes on Argentina in the last game in the group and so only one of them can finish ahead of India in the best case scenario for them. This means India is guaranteed a top four finish even if it loses the final match against Canada. How does one edit the table? Is that automated? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.5.187.192 (talk) 17:28, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Supercup
Hey man last year in supercup, Neymar, Douglass , and vermalen were hit in the squad and are considered winners. Uefa gives 40 medals to the winning team and that siwy Ronaldo bale and Toni kroos Pepe and keylor navas are considers winners even though they were not called up Aavelarx (talk) 13:30, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Supercup
Will you take down Neymar 2015 supercup honour? If you don't it just shows your hypocrisy Aavelarx (talk) 12:28, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

2016 UEFA Super Cup
Any chance of some backup? The discussion has hardly moved on, but I would appreciate someone there alongside me so I don't feel like I'm pissing into the wind. – PeeJay 17:08, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Indeed. As you said, you can't win against fanboys. Makes me wonder why we even bother on here when the inmates are clearly running the asylum. – PeeJay 14:12, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

EuroBasket Women 2017 qualification
Hello, Kante4.

I need your explanation. Why are you the article on EuroBasket Women 2017 qualification he made changes to the main page that it has the results in a group, instead of separate articles as it was before or as in the example [UEFA Euro 2016 qualifying here]? — Nn94 14 (talk) 10:32, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Uefa Women's Champions League
Hello! Can you edit this page? Thx — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.5.36.212 (talk) 13:53, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Rubén Yáñez
Rubén Yáñez is no longer registered with Castilla. I have not seen any transactions involving another goalkeeper coming to Madrid, so he must be on the first team. Raul17 II (talk) 12:12, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes he is as it can be seen at the given source. Kante4 (talk) 12:48, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
 * What source? The past two seasons, he was registered with Castilla. The first two matches this season, he was on the Castilla roster. On the latest registration, four players: José Carlos Lazo, José León, Sergio Reguilón and Rubén Yáñez were replaced on the roster by Sergio Díaz, Javi Muñoz, Martin Odegaard and Nikolas Vergos. Díaz and Odegaard were on the Juvenil A roster. The only way Rubén Yáñez can play for Madrid is to be on the Castilla roster (#31) or Madrid's (#25). Raul17 II (talk) 00:45, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
 * The source given above the current squad. It shows the roster of the first team and he has #31. Kante4 (talk) 04:02, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Madrid's website doesn't update quickly. It's a shame that the LFP's website doesn't have the team rosters. Raul17 II (talk) 15:53, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Barea
According to this three sources the Fort Worth Flyers retired Barea's jersey #11 1, 2 and 3 Seriesphile  ( talk  · ctb) 13:45, 4 September 2016 (UTC)