User talk:Kapokbirdnotflying

lokj

Speedy deletion nomination of Age of the Islamic Gunpowders
Hello Kapokbirdnotflying,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Age of the Islamic Gunpowders for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Mccapra (talk) 16:06, 26 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Mccapra Hello. This is actually a long story. This was taken from here. The article here on wikipedia existed earlier than 2016. It was the users of egypt search forums who copied and pasted. I've just created this article which highlights only about the Muslim Gunpowders, the Ottoman, Safavid and Mughals specifically. Thank you.--Kapokbirdnotflying (talk) 17:01, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
 * To avoid this happening in the future, please attribute when you copy from other wikipedia pages. See Copying within Wikipedia for more information. Moneytrees🌴Talk🌲Help out at CCI! 17:48, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I don’t think this is right. There are several paragraphs in this article which are identical to several paras on the forum page I provided a link to. Those paras in turn are sourced on the forum page to a book. So it appears to me that both the article and the forum are copied from the same source. Mccapra (talk) 18:45, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Mccapra where? If this is the case then I will removed anything copied or put in our own words. Oh, i can Note that the WP:LINKS can be found across those paragraphs, so looks it wasn't copied. From which source do you think it is copied?--Kapokbirdnotflying (talk) 19:57, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi it was in the link I provided in the speedy deletion notice: but on rereading it I think I misunderstood it and you’re right. The reference to the book is to the item above the one that matches the article. Mccapra (talk) 20:05, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Ok no worries, thanks. To avoid further issues, I'm moving this discussion to the article's talk page. Thank you.--Kapokbirdnotflying (talk) 20:07, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
 * , Don't worry, I'm 100% sure that the forum copied from wikipedia; ctrl F "Wikipedia" on the earwig report, scroll down a bit, and you'll see the citations and edit button were copied, meaning it was undoubtedly copied from wikipedia. Moneytrees🌴Talk🌲Help out at CCI! 21:26, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
 * ok thanks for resolving and sorry to bother you both with this. Mccapra (talk) 21:28, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Spread of Islam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Timurid ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Spread_of_Islam check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Spread_of_Islam?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:25, 27 April 2020 (UTC)