User talk:Kar358

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! VQuakr (talk) 21:12, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Ahmed Mohamed clock incident. Thank you. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 21:25, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Ahmed Mohamed clock incident shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 21:35, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Ahmed Mohamed clock incident. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 21:36, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Breitbart is categorically unacceptable as a source for claims about living people due to its record of lies, fabrications and mistakes relating to living people it opposes. If you insert claims sourced to Breitbart into an article again, I will request that you be topic-banned from articles about living people. If you need help understanding what is and isn't a reliable source, see the Reliable Sources Noticeboard. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 21:38, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 21:43, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for continued disruption, refusal to discuss. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 21:59, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

{reply to|Username}} Yamla, NortBySouthBaranof already engaged in numerous discussions on the talk page in which he refused to compromise after deleting other user's content. I would like to ask why I hold the obligation of starting a duplicate discussion on a talk page when my edits were the ones being deleted? I am new to this website, so if my behavior was disruptive, I apologize. But I believe I have demonstrated a willingness to compromise here, albeit in the wrong forum. And if the charge is now edit warring instead of a refusal to talk, then why are VQuakr and NorthBySouthBaranof not similarly blocked? They violated the 3-reversions rule as well, and the page might benefit from having both parties temporarily removed. Kar358 (talk) 23:00, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Neither I nor VQuakr have violated the 3RR; moreover, even if we had done so, 3RR has an express exception for reverting clear and unambiguous BLP violations, and your repeated insertion of conspiracy theories about living children sourced to Breitbart are unambiguous BLP violations. The fact that there are numerous previous discussions on the talk page, all rejecting your point of view, should be your first clue that your claims and beliefs related to this article are not appropriate for Wikipedia. That you are new to this website is a signal that you need to study our content policies and guidelines before editing complex, controversial issues relating to living people. That you decided to ignore the repeated warnings of myself and others is the sole cause of your unfortunate block. I hope you take this time to study our policies and familiarize yourself with Wikipedia before editing again. We are not a platform for uncritical dissemination of discredited, spurious fringe conspiracies about living people. We are under no obligation to "compromise" with content that violates Wikipedia's fundamental policies, foundational principles and precepts of basic fairness. NorthBySouthBaranof

NorthBySouthBaranof, you fail to mention that I also included sources from Fox News and the Guardian that you deleted. If you don't believe that the most watched cable network in our country is a reliable source, that is your prerogative, but when I also include the primary source itself being referred to in the secondary sources, it's a little bit ridiculous to continue to refer to it as a "conspiracy theory". What factual objection do you have to Mr. Muhammad's facebook post when the mere existence of the post itself is the topic in contention?

(talk) 23:11, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Both VQuakr and myself were requesting that you open a discussion on the article talk page, Talk:Ahmed Mohamed clock incident. The fact is that, as both of us have told you, Breitbart is not an acceptable source *and* your edits removed multiple undisputed reliable sources which specifically discredit the conspiracist claims in question. Contrary to your edit summary, Wikipedians are arbiters of reliability - and consensus has long established that Breitbart is an unacceptable source. I have no objection to an unblock on the condition that you stop edit-warring, commit to informing yourself on key policies relating to articles about living people (notably WP:V, WP:BLP and WP:RS), and discuss your concerns on the article talk page. Edit-warring discredited conspiracist attacks on a child is unacceptable here, and if your intent is to continue to do so, you will be swiftly blocked again. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 22:39, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 22:03, 20 November 2017 (UTC)