User talk:KarCup

If you ask questions on Wikipedia, they will be answered on Wikipedia, and your question was answered 2 days ago. See: Help_desk

For your convience I will copy the answers here on your talk page.
 * Just to clarify, the reason A7 does NOT state that the person was not notable - it states that the article which was deleted did not adequately establish the notability of the person. For clarification on how to establish the notability of a person within an article, please review WP:BIO; or, more specifically in this case, WP:MUSICBIO.  It may just be a matter of re-writing the article, this time providing reliable sources that help establish that the subject meets the criteria of notability as defined in the links I provided. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 23:50, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
 * x3 Please do not provide personal contact information; answers will only be given on this page, and provide this information makes you a target for spammers and stalkers. As a response to your original comment: Though a person may be notable, without reliable sources we have no way to verify this. While I cannot see the deleted page (as I am not an administrator) lack of claims of notability (as defined by this guideline) and lack of sources to back said claims are the most common reasons for A7 deletion. Intelligent  sium  23:53, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
 * (e/c*4) The article was deleted because the information that was presented did not show how Mr Cupper was notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia. An article about the person ideally needs to tell what the person did, and, more importantly, show how the person and his accomplishments are important. Simply being "known in several countries" is not enough; the article also needs to cite reliable sources to verify claims made in the article. Other languages have different guidelines for inclusion and are generally independent from this Wikipedia, hence being on another language's Wikipedia does not automatically justify inclusion. Xenon54 / talk / 23:56, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Conflict of interest
If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  02:43, 1 December 2009 (UTC)