User talk:KaraMayonakaSora

Proposed deletion of Akuma Bengoshi Kukabara
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Akuma Bengoshi Kukabara, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails to assert notability and unsourced. Given that it is a one-shot manga, the likelihood of reliable third-party sources covering the work is piratically none.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Farix (Talk) 02:16, 19 June 2009 (UTC)


 * I deprodded it. If someone has a problem with it, they'll have to take it AFD.  I found 47,900 hits when I Googled for it.  You just have to find the review sites out there, and search for its name in English and Japanese, and surely one of them reviewed it.  Please look at other manga articles, and see how they do things.  Have a picture, list all the information in a side box, etc.  If you need help, post in the article's discussion page.   D r e a m Focus  22:14, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Akuma Bengoshi Kukabara
I have nominated Akuma Bengoshi Kukabara, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Akuma Bengoshi Kukabara. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Farix (Talk) 23:15, 21 June 2009 (UTC)