User talk:Karanacs/archive2

Thanks so much for you second set of eyes; they are so useful when one has read an article 500 times and can no longer see the trees for the forest. Some of the issues you addressed I agree with (and have gotten in disputes over with another editor that I suspect is either an eager teenager, or just not that apt in the English and Relevancy departments. Other things, I hadn't noticed. Thanks again!-- Esprit15d (talk ¤ contribs) 13:29, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Our Page got FA Status
The bot hasn't come though, but according to one the influential FA editor SandyGeorgia (see my talk page), we got it Oldag07 22:02, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Monte Ne
I have addressed all of your concerns left on the Monte Ne FA candidacy page. I tried to fix all of them but needed further clarification on a few. Would you mind checking back and seeing if you can now lend your support for FA. Thanks! --The_stuart 17:30, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Newest FA candidate...well...not yet...
All, I have significantly updated/upgraded the Fightin' Texas Aggie Band page. It still needs work, but is a vast improvement from the previous version. I'd really like to do this page myself so ya'll can comment in its FA review in a week or two. If you have any feedback, please drop me a line on my talk page. OH! and how about that baseball team?!?! Gig 'em! — BQZip01 — talk 06:24, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Pat Green Lucky Ones.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Pat Green Lucky Ones.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:10, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Pat Green Here We go.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Pat Green Here We go.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:10, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Pat Green Georges Bar.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Pat Green Georges Bar.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:11, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Pat Green Dancehall Dreamer.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Pat Green Dancehall Dreamer.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:11, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Pat Green Carry On.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Pat Green Carry On.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:11, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Pat Green Cannonball.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Pat Green Cannonball.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:11, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Assistance Request
I have decided to try and upgrade the Fightin' Texas Aggie Band article to Featured Article status (from a normal article...quite a leap) all by myself. I think its pretty damn good right now, but I would appreciate a once-over before I submit it in 24 hours (6 AM CDT). Once submitted, I expect unconditional some support from you guys. Thanks in advance. :-) — BQZip01 —  talk 10:51, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

I'm back
Well, I've gone and done it and the Aggie Band article is up for Featured Article status. Once you get back from your vacation, any feedback (especially support) would be greatly appreciated. — BQZip01 — talk 08:33, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Texas A&M Wikiproject
Starting the groundwork for a Texas A&M wikiproject. I can't promise ill be active in it. I am sure future aggie wikipedians will pick it up. I just made a list of wikipedia entries that are a&m related. please add on, and organize. Talk:Texas_A%26M_University/WPPrep as for the project itself. I think i will start it once you comes back. WikiProject  Proposed it with the wikiproject council. Put your name down if you are interested in joining Proposal I think after i make this project, of course i will remain sort of active with this group, but i am not just and Aggie. I have many more interests. I think i am going to help bring the Star Trek page to FA status. Gig em Oldag07 03:58, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:DebbieMacomber.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:DebbieMacomber.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:40, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Eloisa-james.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Eloisa-james.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:27, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Karmichael Hunt
Could you copyedit or peer review Karmichael Hunt.

It would be much appreciated.

I know it's got a extensive peer review already, but you being part of Biographies.

 SpecialWindler   talk  09:03, 17 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Do you think the article has the qualities to be FA standard. Are there any problems. Thanks  SpecialWindler   talk  09:31, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Welcome Back
Welcome back. how are you? enjoy your trip. we have done a lot since you were gone. i think we are missing your touch to our pages. we missed ya. i hope you don't mind being inducted into the A&M wikiproject without being asked. hope you had fun. see ya. Oldag07 15:25, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

of course, do what fits you best. first and formost it would be best to organize everything on the project. it would be nice to sort out the articles, and rate them on the TAMU wikiproject. after that. i am not sure what strategy we would like to do. either, get all the "main articles" to GA first, and then try to bring them up to FA. or try to concentrate on one article at a time and bring them one by one to FA. I downloaded the campus master plan, and it has a really good history of the texas A&M campus. that would pretty much complete the Campus of Texas A&M University page. i have already started an outline on that page from what i have read so far. it is good to have you back. I am trying to tame my wikiholic tendencies. not working all that well. as for college, well i am cheating. for this summer, i have signed up for fun classes here. taking figure drawing summer one and accounting 2 summer 2. then i head off to Ohio for the americorps. of course i will be in a college town up there. Ohio State. darn yankees. oh well. have a great one Oldag07 22:33, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Heather_graham_pozzessere.gif
I have tagged Image:Heather_graham_pozzessere.gif as orphaned fairuse. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add article name to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:24, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

FAC review for FTAB
Thansk for your help. I hope all concerns have either been corrected or addressed to your satisfaction. — BQZip01 — talk 08:13, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * BTW, welcome back. I trust you two had a good time? — BQZip01 —  talk 08:15, 18 June 2007 (UTC) (BTW, the link is JUST A JOKE!!! Please don't take it in any way offensive...and I neither require nor desire confirmation or details pertaining to the given question!!!)
 * Done...again... :-) — BQZip01 —  talk 20:07, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Try WP:DATE for the date stuff; pay close attention to the ISO 8601 stuff. — BQZip01 —  talk 20:32, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Response to your response
I certainly don't expect anything less than pickiness (sp?) in an FAC review, but I think one of the reviewers went over the top after you. — BQZip01 — talk 20:35, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Howdy Karanacs! Welcome back! (BQZ: *cough*jealousy*cough*)  Blue Ag09  (Talk) 06:14, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!!!
Well folks, thanks to your reviews and comments, the Fightin' Texas Aggie Band is now a featured article on Wikipedia. It should take a day or so to update, but it's a done deal. Thanks for the help,. — BQZip01 — talk 19:30, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Margate F.C.
Thanks for the kind words! ChrisTheDude 07:24, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Starting 2 core Texas A&M Pages
I created chimera test articles from different articles for new pages that I have suggested should we choose to go for the featured topic award. Most of what i did was copy and paste. none of the sections flow.
 * Academics of Texas A&M University
 * Student Life of Texas A&M University

I need some suggestions on where to continue. especially on student life, although we could expand some of the colleges.

remember to get featured topic status just have to get them to GA status. i don't think these articles are FA type articles anyways. Thanks for your help. Oldag07 12:35, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Again?
I've completed all of your suggestions. I've also improved the article in other small ways. If possible, could you look through the article one more time? Also, do you think that this article would be ready for GA? -- Psych  less   23:14, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Oops, the article you reviewed is Serranus Clinton Hastings. The first peer review you left on him can be found here. Thanks! -- Psych  less   16:17, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Stuff for the two new pages
Student life at Texas A&M University
 * the more i am told that an article like this is impractical, the more reasons i think we should have one.  obviously most of you don't want to work on this with is fine, but id like suggestions. Oldag07 05:47, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Peer Review
Im having trouble putting in the code for peer reviews, I asked someone else to help me but I guess it would be better to ask you since you review them. The article, Steve Nash needs to be re-reviewed. Can you put in the code and stuff for me. Thanks War  rush  17:44, 21 June 2007 (UTC) I keep putting it on but the Peerreview template on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Peer_review isn't working. Look under requests. War  rush  17:58, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Nevermind, got it. War  rush  18:01, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

RE:FA Nom
Oh, OK. Don't want to rouse the hens. Thanks for the tip.-- Esprit15d (talk ¤ contribs) 16:14, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

RE:John Mayer
YAY!...and thanks.-- Esprit15d (talk ¤ contribs) 20:40, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!
Hi Karanacs. Thank you very much by The Resilient Barnstar. I hope that my errors are fence correcting and that soon in wiki, can be consulted ample information of romance novel. E-romance 21:31, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
...for a really helpful peer review. Have some brownies...



Image:Pat_Green_Cannonball.jpg
I have tagged Image:Pat_Green_Cannonball.jpg as orphaned fairuse. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add article name to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. Bigr Tex  18:31, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Pat_Green_Lucky_Ones.jpg
I have tagged Image:Pat_Green_Lucky_Ones.jpg as orphaned fairuse. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add article name to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. Bigr Tex  18:32, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Pat_Green_Three_Days.jpg
I have tagged Image:Pat_Green_Three_Days.jpg as orphaned fairuse. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add article name to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. Bigr Tex  18:33, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Pat_Green_Songs_We_wish_Wed_Written.jpg
I have tagged Image:Pat_Green_Songs_We_wish_Wed_Written.jpg as orphaned fairuse. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add article name to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. Bigr Tex  18:33, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Pat_Green_Carry_On.jpg
I have tagged Image:Pat_Green_Carry_On.jpg as orphaned fairuse. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add article name to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. Bigr Tex  18:33, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Pat_Green_Billy_Bobs.jpg
I have tagged Image:Pat_Green_Billy_Bobs.jpg as orphaned fairuse. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add article name to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. Bigr Tex  18:33, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Pat_Green_Here_We_go.jpg
I have tagged Image:Pat_Green_Here_We_go.jpg as orphaned fairuse. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add article name to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. Bigr Tex  18:34, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Pat_Green_Georges_Bar.jpg
I have tagged Image:Pat_Green_Georges_Bar.jpg as orphaned fairuse. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add article name to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. Bigr Tex  18:34, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Pat_Green_Dancehall_Dreamer.jpg
I have tagged Image:Pat_Green_Dancehall_Dreamer.jpg as orphaned fairuse. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add article name to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. Bigr Tex  18:34, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Howdy
Thanks for all your hard work adding all those entries to our wikipedia site. Unlike me, you are so modest about it. I announce what i do on the board. . . oh well. hope you have a great one. . . Oldag07 07:02, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
 * can't believe the earlier title of this page was "hey". . i am a terrible aggie.  Howdy, howdy, howdy, howdy. . .. .I think we are doing pretty good with the wikiproject.  only A&M related pages that we haven't hit up.  thanks for all your help.  btw, now that I know blueag09's identity, I know that you are the only female in our group. We needed some estrogen in this group.  what would we without you  :-) Oldag07 16:58, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, i haven't until that last message, actually said my gender. While OldAg07 might be a nice wikipedia editor, and maybe even be a decent guy in real life, I have posted some inflammatory stuff on TexAgs.  Thus, I prefer that the "oldag07" identity would be unknown.  blueag and i were both logged on to the point where we both log on at the same time and we knew it.  so i quickly put up my AIM screen name and told him to delete it as fast as possible.   It pretty much spells out my name.  Karen.  That is a nice name.  A few weeks ago a good friend of mine got married to a Karen.  She was a good catch as they say.  you seem like a nice person too.  well than, I apologize for all my secrecy. if you read though blueag's the history page, you probably can catch my AIM screen name.  It is not as if one could do enough research on my talk page and trace me down anyways.  oh well. ttyl.  Thanks and Gig em! Oldag07 02:13, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

happy independence day. Oldag07 12:35, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Featured article candidates/Siege of Malakand
Thanks for your comments on the above FAC for the Siege of Malakand, I have worked to address your points and further comments are welcome! SGGH speak! 16:35, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh incidentally, I want to thank you for not being one of these people who report everything to FAC instead of fixing. I am getting overly stressed by these people who go through all the effort of reporting "you are missing a full stop, fix this now it is terrible" rather than just doing the decent, simple, community supportive thing of fixing it themselves. I mean I don't own the article and I'm glad that you have realised this and helped to pitch it right when I'm at the end of my mental teather! Thanks, owe you one. SGGH speak! 16:44, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

List of romantic novelists
Without articles, there is no way to know which are valid and notable but don't currently have articles, and which are simply vanity edits by unpublished or self-published authors. IrishGuy talk 01:17, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

So additions by anonymous users or brand new users that make no other edits ...I am to believe there is a reasonable probability that these will become articles? That they aren't just vanity entries? IrishGuy talk 01:35, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

80% of that list are redlinks. That is rediculous. The list is insanely long and the vast majority are redlinks. Actually, I have removed redlinks from other lists. It takes time. This is an encyclopedia, not the yellow pages. People come to that article to learn more about authors...which they can't do when 80% of them don't even have articles. IrishGuy talk 02:16, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Country Weekly
Well, thanks to me, we finally have an article on Country Weekly. It's not much of an article yet, but I'm getting the word out just to let y'all know. Maybe you can help me expand it -- I can't find a lot of good sources out there. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 04:59, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Earl Strom
Thanks Karanacs for your feedback in regards to the Earl Strom article. Your comments were very helpful and I will take them into consideration for future edits. Thanks again! RyguyMN 03:25, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Bobby Eaton copyedits
I just wanted to thank you for taking a bit of time out to do some copy editing on the Bobby Eaton article, is there any way I could persuade you to go through the whole article and help out? it's one of my pet projects here at Wikipedia and I think that once it's gone through a good copyedit it's probably ready to be put up for "GA" consideration. Any help is greatly appriciated. MPJ-DK 07:39, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm a huge wrestling fan myself so I'd be able to go over it afterwards to see if there are any "lingo" issues from your edits but if you'd rather I find someone else to look at it that's 100% cool too, I'd understand MPJ-DK 14:24, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Student life
I am certainly not done yet, but it has gone a long way. Admittedly my grammar stinks, and i haven't properly cited may of the facts i have on the page. But i figured it would be faster for me to write out ideas and than edit it later. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Texas_A%26M/SL_beta Thoughts? Oldag07 04:10, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Help?
Want to help peer review an article for me? I re wrote it in a day, obtained a GA the next, and I need much help to get it to FA status. So, want to help me and peer review Dookie for me? Thanks :) Xihix 23:39, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Georgette Heyer novel categories
I note you're removing category Romance novels from various novels written by Heyer. Are you aware that not all her novels fall into the romance category? She also wrote several straight historical novels, as well as some whodunnits with a contemporary setting. Espresso Addict 09:08, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Ronald Niel Stuart
Thankyou very much for the extensive review you gave this article at FAC. The article has now passed and I wanted to show my appreciation of your hard work. All the best, --Jackyd101 12:33, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

Roy FA
The FAC process is nearing completion for the article Roy Welensky, which you have commented on. Can you please make the time to attend to some outstanding points related to your oppose? Cheers, Michael talk 03:41, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:KyleFieldeast.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:KyleFieldeast.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:KyleFieldeast.jpg fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: Image is actually licensed under Attribution-NoDerivs, which is prohibited on Wikipedia To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:KyleFieldeast.jpg, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 09:05, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

John Mayer FA promotion
I want to thank you for your assistance in bringing the John Mayer article to FA. It means the culmination of almost two years of work for me, and wouldn't have been possible without help from the WP community. In particular, I want to thank you, since you are a reviewer among reviewers - strict and thorough, but polite and reasonable. Thanks again.--Esprit15d 12:28, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for all your hard work on the History page. i have been slacking as of recently. Oldag07 02:12, 1 August 2007 (UTC) (forgot to sign in again)

Romance authors
Whenever you have time I wouldn't mind if you looked over Talk:List of romantic novelists and let me know if you think I'm being paranoid or not. Thanks! --ImmortalGoddezz 15:55, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

List of romantic novelists
Hi Karanacs. Thanks, I consider interesting to see the date of birth and death of the authors, without having to visit their pages. I'm using the format ISO 8601, because I believe that it is shorter and better to visualize it in a list. Belagaile 07:54, 2 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi Karanacs. I have eliminated only the links that took to pages that weren't of romance authors. Example: Samantha Carter, She isn't an author is a fiction character. I'll change the dates' format.


 * OK, when I eliminates a link, I'll create another new one. Belagaile 06:46, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Dead links on A&M History page
FYI, see talk page. — BQZip01 — talk 04:46, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

I'm not going to oppose based on this, but they do need to be fixed and I'd hate for someone else to catch it before they were fixed. — BQZip01 — talk 19:26, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

NICE JOB
Excellent work! — BQZip01 — talk 19:26, 7 August 2007 (UTC)


 * I think the A&M Wikiproject members each working on one project with the others supporting seems to work pretty well. I've got a rough outline of what I am going to to with the Corps of Cadets page and I should have it up in a few weeks. Any help you can provide at that time would be appreciated (I intend to do a one-step to FA status just like the FTAB article). — BQZip01 —  talk 03:37, 8 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Karanacs. you never complain, and you always do good work.  things like that should be said more often.  Oldag07 05:30, 13 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Here, here. We have our disagreements, but we always seem to resolve them. Glad to work with you! — BQZip01 —  talk 17:02, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

FAC History of Baltimore City College
Thanks for your contribution to the discussion concerning this article. At this point, I think I have addressed most of your concerns. That being said, I was the major contributor to the article originally so I do not know how effective my copy edit was. After all, my prose is not going to sound nearly as problematic to me as it will to others, considering that I should know what I am trying to say. Anyway, thanks again for your contribution. Golem88991 16:41, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the copy edit and all of your help with the article. I really appreciate it. My prose has always been problematic. Golem88991 15:13, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Hi, Karancs, I just wanted to let you know that specific cite templates are not a requirement of WP:WIAFA. Many editors hate them. Consistently formatted citations is the only requirement. Sandy Georgia (Talk) 19:12, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:JamesTruchard.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:JamesTruchard.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 22:18, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Cranmer FAC
All publishers have been added into the citation templates on the Thomas Cranmer article. I hope I will have your support, but I am willing to take more suggestions from you as needed. -- SECisek 11:15, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

WTF??
Any idea what happened to the History of Texas A&M page? it is gone from the list of FACs? I hope it made it!!! — BQZip01 — talk 17:04, 14 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Good! Thank GOD the History of Georgia Tech article didn't make it. It was awful and the primary editor was an ass! — BQZip01 —  talk 17:14, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

On a lighter note
I'd love to help on the Bonfire page and get it up for FA ASAP so it can be up on the main page for its 10th anniversary. Wanna go for it?!? — BQZip01 — talk 17:04, 14 August 2007 (UTC)


 * There are a lot of sources on the web. We just have to be careful about which ones we use and where they come from (limit Battalion/BCS Eagle articles as much as possible). In addition, a lot of the articles cover the same information. It wouldn't be too difficult to reference each sentence with a new reference. :-)
 * I think this is one of those articles where one person should be in charge with a few people helping. You wanna lead it, or should I?
 * If you want to lead it, I suggest a simple timetable and assign sections to all who want to help and give them concrete ideas on how to improve the article. I'd be happy to help come up with the plan if you want to head it up. — BQZip01 —  talk 17:27, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
 * All right then. I'll take the lead. Give me a couple of days to look it over and get an idea of where we need to go with it and I'll get in touch with you and others. BTW, enjoy your medal. You earned it:

Scratch a couple of days. My basic outline is on the talk page. Let's roll!!! — BQZip01 — talk 17:51, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Hell, I'm basically done. Now all I have to do is go back and make sure it satisfies the WP:MoS criteria (you know, all that stuff no one actually sees, but is required). Ready for FA?!? — BQZip01 — talk 20:09, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Peer review
I noticed your thorough and helpful reviews at WP:PR and wondered if you would be willing to peer review an article I have written on Thoughts on the Education of Daughters by Mary Wollstonecraft. I would, of course, be willing to peer review or copy edit an article in return. Here are some samples of my work: a recent peer review of Poe's "The Raven" and some quick copy editing I did a few days ago - and. Awadewit | talk  04:32, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Reveille
Howdy Karanacs. Did you know there is a comprehensive book about Rev? It's called Reveille: First Lady of Texas A&M. I actually borrowed a copy from Evans and started reading it. Unfortunately I was busy with course work at the time so I only read one part of the book that talks about the "Origins of Reveille". As I read I summarized the text here. Do you think we should add that to the Reveille article?  Blue Ag09  (Talk) 06:21, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Heather_graham_pozzessere.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Heather_graham_pozzessere.gif. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast 09:14, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Wikibreak
I am going to take a serious wikibreak for at least the next month. i am moving to a new place, and i really need to get settled and wikipedia is on the bottom of my priorities at the moment second only to texags. i really am not sure how much free time i will have when i finally get settled down. ill try not to be completely inactive, but for me, the best way to get away from something is cold turkey. it has been great working with yall. gig em! Oldag07 05:08, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Bonfire chart
A chart like that would be very useful but, there's my 2 cents — BQZip01 —  talk 18:26, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Use smaller text so it doesn't take up so much space.
 * 2) Combine Cut and Load; use weeks, not weekends (it continued throughout the week as well)
 * 3) Maybe add some color to it?


 * I'll tweak as necessary — BQZip01 —  talk 19:02, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Peer review request
No pressure, but would you peer review the Danny Tidwell article? Thanks for even considering the request.--Esprit15d 18:14, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

John Frusciante peer review
John Frusciante's peer review has been up for a few days now and has yet to yield a review. You were so helpful with the critique you offered during its first review a couple months ago, that we'd be honored if you'd review it again. It's worth saying that the article has undergone a complete revitalization since you first reviewed it, so expect something different if you choose to take a look. Unconditional thanks. Grim-Gym 07:20, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Bruno Maddox
Dear Karanacs, would you mind reviewing my article on novelist/journalist Bruno Maddox? It is currently at WP:FAC and is struggling for attention. I would appreciate any comments you might have.-BillDeanCarter 14:32, 27 August 2007 (UTC)