User talk:Karel felipe

Welcome
Hello, Karel felipe, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

There is a page about the verifiability policy that explains the policy in greater detail, and another that offers tips on the proper ways of citing sources. If you are stuck and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! ./zro (⠠⠵) 06:20, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

March 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Lotus Computer has been reverted.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bfacebook\.com (links: http://www.facebook.com/topic.php?uid=43289409731&topic=7686&ref=mf/, http://www.facebook.com/pages/lotus-computer/43289409731/).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 07:55, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Lotus Computer, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Lotus Computer and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Rurik (talk) 13:32, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. The fact that you think language like "At the age of 18, founder Karel Felipe, a freelance graphic designer realized the need for a new kind of computer company; one that understands its customers and delivers the best possible quality and service." is "completely objective" shows why we are deleting this as advertising. Please read WP:SPAM and especially Conflict of interest. NawlinWiki (talk) 14:58, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template hangon underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 15:28, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam); and,
 * 4) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. KuyaBriBri Talk 15:31, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

'''I am reading up on the conflict of interest subject. If you have any suggestions for improving the article, please let me know.''' Karel felipe (talk) 15:34, 9 March 2009 (UTC)


 * First, it's your company. You should not be writing about it per WP:COI.  You wrote: "If I don't write about it, who will?"  That indicates that the company is not yet notable per WP:CORP.  Once there are reliable independent sources that discuss the company's notability, someone else is likely to write about it.  Until then, you shouldn't.  NawlinWiki (talk) 15:54, 9 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Thank you, I can accept that. That's all I needed, is a valid reason. "blatant advertising" and "notability" doesn't cut it because that's what every other article about a good company does. And thanks for deleting the CyberPower article. That's what inspired me to write my own, by the way. Actually it kind of upsets me that CyberPower was up for months, while mine was up for hours, seeing as theirs was more obvious advertising. But anyway...

In a few months, you'll see some valid sources ;-)

Thanks for the help. Much appreciated :-)

Karel felipe (talk) 16:03, 9 March 2009 (UTC)


 * You're welcome, and good luck. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:23, 9 March 2009 (UTC)