User talk:Karen.watson.emap

Welcome!

Hello, Karen.watson.emap, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Speedy deletion nomination of BRAD Insight


A tag has been placed on BRAD Insight requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Syrthiss (talk) 11:22, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

August 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article BRAD Insight, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Quasihuman (talk) 12:10, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of BRAD Insight
I have nominated BRAD Insight, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/BRAD Insight. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. GregJackP  Boomer!   12:24, 4 August 2010 (UTC)


 * You moved BRAD Insight to Brad media to Crookstill? Please stop moving things around for no apparent reason, especially during an AfD discussion. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 13:28, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
 * One more time: please STOP moving things and blanking page content. This is becoming disruptive. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 13:30, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

BRAD/Crookstill
Generally speaking, it is not appropriate to move articles as you did with Crookstill, while there is a deletion discussion on going. It is potentially confusing to people who are trying to follow the discussion and the article's history. Furthermore, one of your edits, where you replaced the company info with information about a town in the U.K., make it appear that you may be trying to hide or alter the history in a way that is confusing. I'm willing to assume that you're just unfamiliar with the whole process. However, the best thing for you to do right now is to concentrate on improving the article--specifically, if you want the article to remain, you should focus on finding reliable, secondary sources (magazine & newspaper articles, reliable websites, etc.) that verify that this company meets Wikipedia's notability criteria. If you have any questions, feel free to ask here or at the article. Qwyrxian (talk) 13:31, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:BRAD_Insight.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:BRAD_Insight.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Closedmouth (talk) 13:46, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Crookstill, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Crookstill was changed by Karen.watson.emap (u) (t) blanking the page on 2010-08-04T13:49:35+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 13:49, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:17, 4 August 2010 (UTC)