User talk:KarenYangNY

January 2019
Hello, I'm Rosalina2427. I noticed that you recently removed content from Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Rosalina2427 (talk to me) 02:18, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Terribly sorry. I will put something in the edit summary.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Rosalina2427 (talk to me) 02:24, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rosalina2427 (talk to me) 02:26, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford. Rosalina2427 (talk to me) 02:27, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

At least I won't be burned at the stake.

Note
Welcome to Wikipedia, KarenYangNY! Thank you for your contributions. This is an encyclopedia, so remember that it's a necessity to include references listing reliable websites, newspapers, articles, books and other sources you have used to write or expand articles. Please understand that these sources should verify the information in a fair and accurate manner. However, you must not copy and paste text you find anywhere, except for short quotations, marked as such with quote marks and carefully cited to the source the quote was taken from. New articles and statements added to existing articles may be deleted by others if unreferenced or referenced poorly or if they are copyright violations. See referencing for beginners for more details.

I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Questions or type at the bottom of this page.

Here are some more pages that you might find helpful: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Rosalina2427 (talk to me) 02:23, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

EDV
The suppression of the truth must stop. Shakspere didn't write Shakespeare.

Cite a source for your edits, please. Rosalina2427  (talk to me) 02:26, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

January 2019
Hello, I'm Mediatech492. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Merchant of Venice have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. ''Your edit was reverted as you have provided no reliable source support for your assertion. '' Mediatech492 (talk) 02:35, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Is it constructive to think that an illiterate man named Shakspere wrote Macbeth and Hamlet?
 * You need to provide reliable sources to support your assertions. Unsupported edits will be reverted. as per Wikipedia rules. You have been advised about this multiple times before. 02:42, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Who decides what is "reliable"? The people who peddle the Shakespeare myth, that's who.
 * This article exists and has reliable sources. Rosalina2427  (talk to me) 02:48, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Who decides what is "reliable"? The people who peddle the Shakespeare myth, that's who.
 * The rules for Reliable sources are clear. If you want to edit on this site you must follow the rules. Thank you. Mediatech492 (talk) 02:51, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Myth and fantasy are not reliable. You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 03:02, 23 January 2019 (UTC)