User talk:Karenlee9612

Deletion discussion about Beverly Naidus
Hello, Karenlee9612,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Beverly Naidus should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Beverly Naidus.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, J bh  Talk  12:11, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Recent edit reversion
In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask. S Philbrick (Talk)  12:19, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
 * You asked" Hello, I work for the graduate school and am trying to update the Wikipedia page as the school was relaunched last year. Would it be a copyright violation if I pull official information from our website?"
 * The answer is Yes. Unless the copyrightholder explicitly licenses the material with an acceptable license, it cannot be copied or closely paraphrased.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  15:45, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Please also read wp:coi which almost certainly applies.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  15:46, 29 May 2020 (UTC)