User talk:Karinagw

Sorry about that note on another page
I didn't realize who you were. There are a lot of folks in fandom concerned about John and Perdita's health; some of us are even praying for them, regardless of how they'd feel about that. (I know it sounds silly, but the idea of John Boardman not being in Brooklyn is just... wrong! It's like moving the Chrysler Building.) -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  17:15, 11 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Gonna sound a little bitter here and I apologize. It's been really clear for a number of years that their mental/physical health have been deteriorating. Especially my mom.  There have been a tiny handful who have been helping them/us try to cope and let them remain in NYC.  A bunch of people, even now, are accusing us of kidnapping them...taking them to Siberia.  My mother has no memory of the house that she lived in for 45 years. Her short term memory is completely gone.  However, she is getting her medication and meals on a regular basis (and is as content as she can be given the circumstances) something that was not happening in Brooklyn despite our best efforts to allow them to remain in that same home.  John's physicality is improving thanks to (again) regular meds and a diet which is actually good for him, however, my sister and I can see the beginnings of a mental decline which the facility's staff cannot see because at his worst, he will still be better than most people.


 * When he was in the rehab facility in Brooklyn for almost 7 weeks, he was visited by 4 people and received a handful of emails, and a couple of cards/letters. Where were all these concerned fans then?  Gee, no First Saturday. Darn. Karinagw (talk) 05:02, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Super Siblings
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Super Siblings, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.supersiblingscomics.com/about.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:44, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Super Siblings


A tag has been placed on Super Siblings requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. NortyNort (Holla) 08:17, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Super Siblings


A tag has been placed on Super Siblings requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. &mdash; RHaworth 09:27, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

talkback
Ego White Tray (talk) 02:27, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Super Siblings


The article Super Siblings has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Tagged for notability since forever, added by request of the cartoonist (no article on him) and terrible sourcing. Does not meet sourcing guidelines as currently interpreted, and actually never did meet sourcing guidelines."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Guy (Help!) 13:43, 20 February 2018 (UTC)