User talk:Karishmachandna

Speedy deletion nomination of Kangaroo films
A tag has been placed on Kangaroo films, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Moreover, please add more verifiable sources, not only 3rd party sources. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 17:22, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Making first drafts
I see what work you have done after the initial speedy deletion tagging of the article, and unfortunately, your priorities are in the wrong place.

The first order of business is to write a valid stub that states at the very least what Kangaroo Films is and how we should expect it to meet our inclusion guidelines. No need to have sources at this point, but that comes before inserting pictures, Facebook pages (which must wait after third-party references), etc.

Hope this helps. --  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 17:45, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Kangaroo films
Hello,, and thank you for your contributions!

I wanted to let you know it seems an article you worked on, Kangaroo films, is copied from another Wikipedia page, Kangaroo flims. It's fine to do this as long as you provide the following information in the edit summary:


 * 1) a link to the article you copied from
 * 2) the date you copied it

You can do this now by editing the page, making any minor edit to the article, and adding the above information into the edit summary.

If you're still not sure how to fix the problem, please leave a message at the help desk. It's possible that I made a mistake, so feel free to remove the tag I placed on the article.

Thanks again for helping build the free encyclopedia! CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:12, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Notability
Ignore the notice above - that is because when you made an article with the wrong title and then another with the same contact, an automatic anti-copyright-violation system noticed it. If you should happen to make a mistake in a title again, you can use the "Move" tab at the top of the page to correct the title.

The reason your articles have been deleted is that they do not give any indication why the company is important or significant to have an article in an encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not a business listing directory or a vehicle for any kind of promotion. Articles have to be of enough general interest for an encyclopedia article: the Wikipedia term for that is Notability, which is not a matter of opinion but needs to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." The test is, have other people, independent of the subject, thought it significant enough to write about? More detail in Notability (organizations and companies) and WP:42.

Also, articles must be written from a neutral point of view, and so people are strongly discouraged from writing about themselves or their own organizations, because of the conflict of interest involved. For more advice, read the FAQ/Organizations, in particular the sections headed: Regards, JohnCD (talk) 13:25, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Why doesn't Wikipedia have an article on my organization?
 * I think my organization deserves an article on Wikipedia but none exists. What can I do?