User talk:Karl sieha

Currencies Direct - reversal of changes
Hi Karl, I note that you reverted the changes I made to Currencies Direct. I see that you did a lot of work on this article and encourage you to continue, but one of the principles of wikipedia is Neutral point of view. Please feel free to put back any things I have removed if you feel are important and meet NPOV, however please explain why this is the case, please do not blanket revert back all the changes without any explanation. Please also use templates for references so avoid link rot as I found some of the links you added no longer worked and at least if there is other information its easier to track down other references that support the article. Sargdub (talk) 08:33, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Hi there,

After much research some things have changed with Currencies Direct, I am aware that the format used is incorrect, mainly the table. However all facts that are placed are correct to a T and some facts others place are incorrect such as

Offices Dubai, Sydney do not exist India, Spain, South Africa, US do! and now Portugal offices in place.

My apologies about the table can that list stay the same but the table taken off.

In addition Peter Ellis legaly claims that he does not want to be mentioned what so ever on the page, so take both names off in this case both Peter Ellis as well as Mayank.

Finally if you would like to keep the 12 references used please do so, as of course it seems uneccessary to have 40 plus when some are duplicates.

I comply with you completely on the terms above included please.

thank you.


 * I have updated the history with the information you mention and made it a simple list which is fine, but needs reference as Portugal is not even mentioned on Currency Direct own web site. Also they say on the web site and I can see in news articles that they opened offices in Sydney and Melbourne. However they I agree that they are gone as they no longer have them on the web site, but would be good to put more information why they have gone.  What Peter Ellis or Mayank want is completely irrelevant, all that matters for Wikipedia is if it is a fact and it can be verified, the only reason to remove them is if it seems its not important in the article.  However, I think founders are relevant for the company and they are referenced.  I have removed the information about the other staff as non seem very important and was written like an advert which Wikipedia does not allow.  For more information on this, see
 * Policy on neutral point of view
 * Guideline on spam
 * Guideline on conflict of interest, the other changes are just to tidy and conform with Wikipedia articles. Sargdub (talk) 11:21, 11 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi Karl, in response to your message where you said you said that
 * Hi Sargdub,
 * I noticed people keep changing Currencies Direct, I am reverting to how it was for the following reasons:
 * Ignacio Hernandez is not a member of Currencies Direct, he was and is no longer
 * Peter Ellis does not legally want to be mentioned as a co-founder of Currencies Direct
 * So please take these two people of the page or more so revert to previous format.
 * thanks
 * Karl
 * It makes no difference what Peter Ellis wants, wikipedia is not controlled by the people that the information is about it only matters if it is a fact and that can be verified, which it appears it is. As for Ignacio Hernandez if he is left the company happy for you to replace him with current CEO or similar, but please put a clear description in the edit summary box change so people can understand what you are doing.  Previous changes you have made have been unclear and hence I reverted them. Sargdub (talk) 18:51, 8 March 2011 (UTC)