User talk:Karldoh

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Cheers,  Tewfik Talk 16:53, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Serafin
I appreciate your efforts. Please don't let the article Bureaucracy down now and change the current state as you see fit, regardless of Serafin. Sockpuppets of him can also be reported at User:Luna Santin/Sockwatch/Serafin. Sciurinæ 20:00, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Unique
First of all, thank you for logging in. You have done not only me, but also the Wikipedia community - and yourself, you'll see! - a big favor. Please make sure you stay logged in every time you edit! Thanks!

Perhaps it boils down to the definition of "unique". I am not a native English speaker, but my perception of the meaning of this word as "exceptional" rather than "the only one" when used like that. I don't think the word implies there is nothing like that, but perhaps you can find a better word.

Oh, I re-wrote the article some two years ago, and at that time I didn't put a reference by that sentence, and I also believe the press release in question asserts the car has a transverse-mounted straight six, I would not use it as a reference to its "uniqueness". As a matter of fact, I was thinking of another of the sources as a reference for that (I didn't go inline back then). Anyhoo, in a very OR style, I just put down what I knew, as my understanding is that an article on a car model in Wikipedia is not a specs sheet (there are better sources for those) but rather an explanation why this or another model is notable among others (assuming all car models are notable enough to have their entries, which is an implicit assumption widely accepted @ Wikipedia).

Anyhoo - can you suggest a better wording for that? PrinceGloria (talk) 23:09, 13 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Thank you for replying and for the absolutely undeserved complement (I actual wish I was as nice as other Wikipedians). I will not defend unique to death, though unusual or notable do not seem "strong enough" for me. Feel free to reword as you please, yet I would appreciate it if you could think of another word closer in its meaning to what I meant with unique. Kind regards, PrinceGloria (talk) 20:13, 15 May 2008 (UTC)


 * To be honest, uncommon is as insipid as it gets to me... I used "unique" to emphasize the car is remarkable for that, this is why a reader should know about it. On realizing that, I though remarkable might have been the word I was looking for in the first place. How do you feel about it? PrinceGloria (talk) 09:41, 18 May 2008 (UTC)


 * I don't see "remarkable" as non-NPOV here, but do change to whatever suits you - in case it won't suit me, we shall continue with this discussion on matters of utmost importance ;) PrinceGloria (talk) 11:04, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Your comment on my talk page
Your comment on my talk page is misdirected. I said nothing about your English. Reread that exchange, and you'll see another user said something about "grasp of the english language", not me. Please read more carefully in the future. okedem (talk) 15:15, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)