User talk:Karlioos

About your concern here... please note that progress is not made by deleting verifiable opinions that constitute someones view. If you disagree with the view, make it more neutral by providing evidence of the value of conservatories; by providing relevant citations; or mentioning the large number of conservatories etc. This enriches the article. Deleting opinions that you may not share goes in the opposite direction. I invite you to find positive views and enrich the article with them. Fdsal;fjh (talk) 19:53, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

- Please review http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not Wikipedia is an encyclopedia to provide factual information. It is not a place to publish "opinions that constitute someones view."


 * Please review Neutral_point_of_view. An opinion - if verifiable - exists (the existence is factual reality) and should be included in proper context. To quote from the linked page: "An article and its sub-articles should clearly describe, represent, and characterize all the disputes within a topic, but should not endorse any particular point of view. It should explain who believes what, and why, and which points of view are most common." As explained above; I think we can enrich the page by showing criticism and putting it in context by mentioning that this is a minority view (should have been mentioned more clearly); or providing some positive views, or the large number of conservatories etc. Fdsal;fjh (talk) 07:12, 3 July 2010 (UTC)