User talk:Karlsanders

Proposed deletion of Ena (EP)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ena (EP), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Somno (talk) 02:38, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Ena (EP)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Ena (EP), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Ena (EP). Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Somno (talk) 04:56, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I restored Naahorus and included it in the AfD, what you need to do is to join the discussion there and provide sourcing as per WP:RS Wikipedia articles should use reliable, third-party, published sources. Reliable sources are credible published materials with a reliable publication process; their authors are generally regarded as trustworthy or authoritative in relation to the subject at hand.. That will convince the wider community that Naahorus and the EP are notable. Gnangarra 05:56, 28 July 2008 (UTC)