User talk:Karlwinn

Notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Borderline legal threat by Karlwinn. My name is not dave (talk/contribs) 09:48, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

I am a new user to Wikipedia. I believed I was asking a legitimate question about procedure. i.e How do users resolve these issues where the subject (Kerry Bolton) as libelled, or at the very least treated unfairly. If you read the question in context you will see that I was asking for advice on how Wikipedia resolves such disputes. I asked if there was a resolution framework in place, or was the issue simply ignored and left to the victim to seek redress via legal channels. It seems to me that this ban is more motivated by a desire to remove somebody who is attempting to correct a libellous entry on Kerry Bolton, rather than any real breach of etiquette or rules. I made no "threat". I asked, what I believed to be, a question about the resolution of these type of issues.

Karlwinn (talk) 10:42, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * If you didn't make a threat, then you made 'legal'. At this stage of dispute the answer is no, there is no other channel at this point. I am not in the position to discuss anything else further. The best way is to use your reserved right to submit an unblock request -- you may first want to make a cuppa, clear your mind, read WP:GAB and make one, if you wish. My name is not dave (talk/contribs) 10:49, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.

You are apparently not here to build an encyclopedia but to impose your particular POV and make legal threats.  A  Train talk 10:27, 19 October 2017 (UTC)