User talk:KarlyKerod/sandbox

1. First, what does the article-draft do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way? I really enjoyed the expansion for this whole section. One example being as simple as acknowledging how the middle ages were also know as the dark ages. It was overall the little clarifications that added up to make excellent revisions.

2. Are there sections in the article that seem unnecessary? Is anything off-topic? I personally don't think any of the information was unnecessary or off-topic, I think that all of the background information provided in the revision enhanced the overall quality and information on this section.

3. Does the article focus too much on negative or positive information? Explain. Remember, neutral doesn't mean "the best positive light" or "the worst, most critical light." It means a clear reflection of various aspects of a topic. I don't think the article focuses on neither positive or negative information. I think the information is more of an explanation (unbiased) and follows a timeline, which was really well revised.

4. Does the article draw conclusions or try to convince the reader to accept one particular point of view? Are most statements in the article connected to a reliable source, such as textbooks and journal articles? Or do they rely on blogs or self-published authors? The article is not necessarily persuading the reader to follow any specific point of view, as it is standard, factual information. The revisions have credible, academic sources used to support the information provided.

5. Are there any changes you would suggest the author apply to the article? Why? Overall, I think the article is great and very informative. I do not see the need for any changes. Keep up the good work!

6. Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Let them know! When reading the section about breakfast, I was thinking that I could possibly go more in-depth with particular meals in my elders choice of food section, so thank you!

7. Write your name followed up by "Tori Hivner (talk) 16:16, 25 October 2019 (UTC)" Tori Hivner Tori Hivner (talk) 16:16, 25 October 2019 (UTC)