User talk:KarmaLogically

November 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Val Valentino has been reverted. Your edit here to Val Valentino was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 16:02, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

December 2017
Hello, I'm Hddty.. An edit that you recently made to Val Valentino seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Hddty. (talk) 08:15, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Val Valentino article
Hello KarmaLogically. This is in reply to your query at Wikipedia talk:Reviewing pending changes. First, when posting to any talk page, please conclude each comment with a signature and timestamp. You do that by typing four tildes: ~. You were logged out when you posted there, and you also wrote something slightly different than your username, so it's a little confusing.

It's very important to understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia with content based on what reliable, independent sources have written about its subjects. The subjects of articles do not get to decide what is included or excluded. Of course, if there is blatantly non-factual content, we want to know about it. In such cases, especially if the erroneous content is potentially damaging, the subject may wish to contact Wikipedia's Volunteer Response Team.

From what you've said, it sounds as if you may have a conflict of interest. If so, it's probably better if you don't edit the article yourself. Please read the relevant guideline for more information on that. Also, on the off-chance there's any remuneration involved, even indirectly, please read the policy on paid editing; if so, it is critically important that you declare it.

I glanced over the edits you made to Val Valentino, and the content you added was uncited. All content without citations to reliable sources is subject to removal. If the article is about a living person, this is especially so. One of your edits also introduced a grammatical error, which may have contributed to its being reverted.

For further advice, I'd suggest you visit the Teahouse, Wikipedia's forum for new users. You're likely to receive a friendly, helpful response to any questions you post there. Rivertorch FIREWATER  04:33, 26 January 2018 (UTC)