User talk:Karo84

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 19:41, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

NoTube LLC - Article
Dear Reviewer, I´d really like to know, why the article hasn´t been accepted?! You wrote, that the article isn´t written objective. Could you please specify this! Because, I mentioned references etc. It is not an advertisement - is the artivcle about Nestle also advertisement? Please let me know and could you please advice me, what I can do next? Thank you. Best Karo84 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karo84 (talk • contribs) 21:05, 11 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Hello there Karo84,


 * There article currently has multiple issues in multiple sections of the article. So the easiest way to summarize it is probably a dotted list
 * The article itself is promotional for multiple reasons:
 * The main body of the article itself is riddled with external links to the companies website, which is linkspam. The main body should not contain external links, those go into the external links section, and only when relevant (Ergo: One link for "Official website" and no link to each and every subpage)
 * The text itself is somewhat promotional, for example: NoTube offers a highly specialized tele-medical coaching service and During the program experienced medical doctors and developmental psychologists
 * The provided sources don't seem to qualify as reliable sources in this context. One of the criteria's for reliable sources, is that they are independant of the subject of the article. Yet they are (co) written by Sheer, who is also the owner of the company.
 * A lot of the sources and article content isn't directly related to the subject of the article. The article - and sourcing - mostly seem to discuss tube feeding as a concept, rather then discussing NoTube LLC. As a result, the article looks a bit like a coatrack, where multiple non-related subjects are discussed.


 * Hope this helps, and with kind regards, Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 10:52, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/NoTube LLC concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/NoTube LLC, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 14:09, 20 August 2013 (UTC)