User talk:Karry999921

Welcome!
Hello, Karry999921, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Winner notice, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Cahk (talk) 08:08, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Winner notice


The article Winner notice has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * WP:NOTDIC

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cahk (talk) 08:08, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Winner-Take-All Law


The article Winner-Take-All Law has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable theory that searches do not show to be a common term. Lacks references and appears to be WP:OR.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:17, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Winner-take-all principle
Hello, Karry999921. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Winner-take-all principle, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.  Onel 5969  TT me 02:58, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. CherylHew ✽ ✉  03:18, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Movie Crowdfunding


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Movie Crowdfunding. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Crowdfunding. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Crowdfunding – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 03:52, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Movie-crowdfunding


The article Movie-crowdfunding has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * nothing specifically notable about Movie crowdfunding to differentiate it from Crowdfunding generally.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 10:30, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Movie-crowdfunding


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Movie-crowdfunding. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Crowdfunding. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Crowdfunding – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. CherylHew ✽ ✉  13:16, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Movie-crowdfunding, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. CherylHew ✽ ✉  13:16, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello
Hello Karry, can you please explain your article creations? If you continue creating unsourced articles founded on seemingly nothing, you may be blocked from editing as well as the articles deleted. --JustBerry (talk) 14:20, 19 December 2016 (UTC)


 * I can find no evidence anywhere that the terms you have written about are actually in use in the senses you attributed to them, and at least one of them is in widespread use with a very different meaning. On the face of it, you appear to be attempting to use Wikipedia to spread expressions that you have made up. If that is so, please stop, as that is not what Wikipedia is for; if, on the other hand, that is not what you are doing, then you really need to explain what you are trying to do. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:03, 19 December 2016 (UTC)


 * See WP:NOT. FYI, your created articles have been deleted from Wikipedia. --JustBerry (talk) 16:18, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Winner-Take-All Law for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Winner-Take-All Law is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Winner-Take-All Law until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:23, 19 December 2016 (UTC)


 * I see that you've recreated this article. Unless you can very quickly provide some independent, reliable sources to show this term is in usage, it will get deleted (again) as something you made up. —C.Fred (talk) 02:52, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Winner-Take-All Law


A tag has been placed on Winner-Take-All Law requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  03:15, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing, because it is clear that you are not here to contribute to building the encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:56, 20 December 2016 (UTC)