User talk:Kartano

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! NSH001 (talk) 12:20, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Speedy deletion of Australian International Arms
A tag has been placed on Australian International Arms, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

it fails to assert notability WP:CSD and is blatant advertising WP:CSD. There are also no independent, third party refs cited

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NSH001 (talk) 12:20, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Australian International Arms
An article that you have been involved in editing, Australian International Arms, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Australian International Arms. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? NSH001 (talk) 14:09, 23 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Hello Kartano. If you want the Australian International Arms article to survive, you need to find reliable independent references that show it is a notable company. Forum websites are not considered reliable. My suggestion is to look through a Google search and find news / known gun magazines / other known sources that discuss AIA. I see there is currently one reference in the article. You'll probably need many more to survive the vote. Do it quickly, as the AfD may close at any time. Regards, -- Lester  20:48, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Greetings
And greetings from a fellow Wikipedian who grew up in Melbourne but who is now stuck in Merbein and Mildura due to work constraints. Maybe we're mirror images of each other? :) -- Longhair\talk 20:55, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Firearms
Welcome to the WikiProject Firearms. I hope you enjoy being a member.--LWF (talk) 06:05, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Remington710.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Remington710.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 13:35, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

A friendly reminder to check dates when replying to discussions
Thanks for your input on the Lee-Enfield talk page! Just a friendly reminder to check the dates on things you're replying to- some of the topics you are responding to are several years old, and have often (usually?) been resolved a long time ago, or weren't a big issue then and are completely irrelevant now. Please, if you could avoid resurrecting old discussion points unless there's something new to add factual information-wise, it would be greatly appreciated and make it easier to follow the discussion as well! Commander Zulu (talk) 07:16, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Namespace vio
I have moved 80.254.147.124 to User:Kartano/sandbox. &mdash; RHaworth 12:43, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Thank you!
Thank you for reverting the vandalism done to my user page! You should know that the IP is a sock of User:Savagebladez, and will likely attack anyone that prevents him from vandalizing Wikipedia. Just a friendly heads up. Thanks again! Fezmar9 (talk) 16:47, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Suck my dick
Kartano, you are engaged in an AfD where all is not well. Suck my dick is not an article per se, it is a redirect. If you want to get rid of it, you should go to Redirects for Discussion. (But you'd never get a consensus to delete it, since it's a simple matter of redirecting for alternate capitalization.) Regards, Drmies (talk) 05:25, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * BTW, you understand that I'm not telling you to, you know, suck it and all. Right? Cause I wouldn't. Drmies (talk) 05:38, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I Completely understand. As was said on your discussion page, having the above title does make THIS page stand out! Kartano (talk) 06:15, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Hey, you saw, perhaps, that the AfD was closed speedily, with a note on where you could take this. I gotta tell you though, the chances are slim for the reasons outlined above. Personally, I think the title of the movie is in pretty poor taste in the first place. At least Eat Shit is not a film, though Eat shit also is a redirect... Happy editing, Drmies (talk) 06:18, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Please assist
Thanks so much for reverting the vandalism on the World Aids Day article. This IP, though shared, has a long history of vandalism reaching back as far as December 2006. Can anything further be done? Please advise. Thx. 38.109.88.194 (talk) 18:19, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * One possibility is to report that IP address to the Administrators. If they've had numerous warnings and keep coming back to vandalise the same page over and over, this is usually your best option.  You can try going here: Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism Kartano (talk) 10:38, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Will do. Thankx. 38.109.88.194 (talk) 20:59, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

your recent warning to User talk:71.182.240.34
User:The Thing That Should Not Be specifically says on his vandalbox:

RC Patrollers: Please note that this is a place that I specifically ask for vandals to vandalize, instead of vandalizing my main userspace. I don't care if you revert anything here, but please don't warn them for vandalizing here. To those editing this page: Please keep this hidden comment on the page, so as to remind other editors to not remove this. Thanks.

You gave the user I listed in the title above a warning anyway. I hope you do not mind that I am removing it. Thank you for your time.  smithers  - talk  -  sign!  00:16, 14 December 2009 (UTC)


 * No problems at all - sorry, my mistake! Kartano (talk) 00:18, 14 December 2009 (UTC)


 * No worries!  smithers  - talk  -  sign!  00:18, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Historical accuracy
What's going on? Various Indian place names have been changed in recent decades, so it's historically inaccurate to call what is now Pune that in a historical reference to a time when it was called Poona. Meher Baba is himself cited calling his birthplace by the old name, and my edit carefully acknowledged the new name. So, what was wrong with that edit, and why should I not revert the undo? PMLawrence (talk) 06:51, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * My apologies - I didn't see a description in the edit and as the edit was an IP recent change, I'd reverted it. Again, my apologies.  Kartano (talk) 06:53, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I finally got around to putting it right. PMLawrence (talk) 15:19, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Reverted your revision to Knife_legislation
Hi Kartano,

I reverted your edit linked above... I assume this was just a mistake, but thought I'd better let you know.

Cheers, Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 07:45, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

You fagg0t
I was fuck!ng talking to you, you bitch. "oh no you're fuck!ng vandalising my fuck!ng goddamn page i better cry a fuck!ng wiki-river" you c0cksucking father of wh0res. Suck my d!ck. That's the last time I ever try to be civil with someone. You have ruined my faith in wikipedia and I will now proceed to retract my $200 donation you miserable cvnt. (comment from User:123.243.255.85 - Kartano (talk) 05:43, 16 December 2009 (UTC))


 * You have been warned repeatedly not to vandalise pages. Wikipedia is encyclopaedic - not a forum for abuse. Kartano (talk) 05:31, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Please also note that your business website at that static IP address is unsecured. Kartano (talk) 05:41, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Abuse response report rejected
I have rejected your recent report at abuse response because it did not meet the requirements for a report. Please review the requirements and make sure an IP address meets them before you submit another report. If you have any questions, please message me on my talk page. Netalarm  happy holidays!  06:14, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

My Edit
My edit was entirely constructive. The references to McCarthy's page are important as "Angels in America" discusses the lingering impact of the red scare on American Society and places the blame of the Rosenbergs deaths at the feet of the discussed party. I suggest you reinstate the edit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.94.198.204 (talk) 11:40, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Pssh
You can't say that my information wasn't correct. I would appreciate if you put my edited information back up on the site. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.111.53.133 (talk) 04:31, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I'll agree that it wasn't exactly incorrect so much as it was more of non-encyclopaedic statement intended to vandalise a page. You can by all means add it back but you'll have to reword your sentiment a little.  Kartano (talk) 05:47, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

My user page
I'm a little late on this, but I was looking through my user page's history, and found this edit you made. Many thanks! C628 (talk) 20:52, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * No problems at all. I had a sneaky suspicion it wouldn't have been your own work.  Kartano (talk) 23:22, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

What's your problem?
Sienna Miller has a Razzie nomination!! You IDIOT!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.19.82.244 (talk) 08:28, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I apologise for that particular rollback. However, your other repeated acts of vandalism have been noted.  Kartano (talk) 08:56, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Express 458 027b.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Express 458 027b.jpg, which you've sourced to www.458express.com. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MilborneOne (talk) 11:26, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

.17 Fireball image
I'm not sure, but I suspect the middle cartridge in your is a ",17 Remington", not a ".17 Rem Fireball", do you know for sure? I was looking at 6mm BR as a reliable source. 58.7.222.137 (talk) 09:55, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

AIA and magazine capacity limits
Your information on the AIA section of the SMLE wikipedia page states that the maximum size magazine obtainable by law is 10 rounds. This is not correct in QLD. There is currently no limitation on magazine capacity for bolt action repeating rifles in QLD. There IS a restriction on importation (but not ownership, as that is controlled by states) imposed by the federal government, however it is not the capacity of the magazines used in AIAs that is the issue. It is that they (for the M10A) are functional in Category D firearms.

The AIA M10B series uses a magazine based on the M14, that is true, however it is missing the hole for the front magazine catch used in the M14, and thus is not usable in a Category D firearm. Because this front catch is not needed, it is possible to use M14 magazines in the AIA M10, with some minor modifications to the magazine which can be done with simple tools. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.161.135.165 (talk) 05:42, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:SpringfieldModel1870.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:SpringfieldModel1870.jpg, which you've sourced to INSUFFICIENT OTRS OVER 1 MONTH OLD. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 20:19, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Melbourne meetup
Hey all, just a reminder that there's a meetup tomorrow at 11am in North Melbourne. There are more details at the meetup page. Hope to see you tomorrow! SteveBot (talk) 04:39, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Meetup invitation: Melbourne 26
Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup next Sunday (6 January). Details and an attendee list are at Meetup/Melbourne 26. Hope to see you there! John Vandenberg 05:34, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Victoria)

Wikipedians by degree
Hi, Category:Wikipedians by degree is a container cat (subcats only). Please consider a more specific subcat if you wish to categorize. Thanks, Slivicon (talk) 18:27, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Fair Use in Australia discussion
As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Proposed deletion of File:Frizzen from flintlock musket.jpg


The file File:Frizzen from flintlock musket.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Putt-Putt Fun Center, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chapel Hill ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Putt-Putt_Fun_Center check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Putt-Putt_Fun_Center?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Self-closed tags
Your sandbox has 27 self-closed  tags and 2 self-closed   tags. I'm not sure what you are trying to do, but neither tag is supposed to be self-closed, and this is the only item in all of English Wikipedia with this issue. Perhaps you are using these tags as a substitute for, which is allowed to be self-closed. —Anomalocaris (talk) 20:38, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Yup! Thanks for the heads up.  I was just dumping a sample HTML file I had sitting here, in order to get it home to properly work on it.  But thank you you!  Kartano (talk) 22:57, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Mass reverting
Hi there, please don't rudely template editors, it's unkind as you must know. If you have a problem with the edits made by others, the appropriate step is to visit the talk page of the article and not to engage in an edit war. 2600:1702:3C80:B60:2071:8EBC:E1CB:A1EA (talk) 20:08, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Then log the fuck IN - don't make anonymous IP edits. Don't make repeated minor edits to published documents, making repeat saves with large amounts of the body copy deleted.  Use a God damn sandbox.  And fucking LOG IN.  DON'T make these changes anonymously.  Jesus.

MfD nomination of User:Kartano/Userboxes/SexualExperimentation
User:Kartano/Userboxes/SexualExperimentation, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Kartano/Userboxes/SexualExperimentation and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Kartano/Userboxes/SexualExperimentation during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- Tamzin [cetacean needed] (she/they) 18:35, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Kartano/Userboxes/SexlessMarriage
User:Kartano/Userboxes/SexlessMarriage, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Kartano/Userboxes/SexlessMarriage and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Kartano/Userboxes/SexlessMarriage during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- Tamzin [cetacean needed] (she/they) 18:41, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of .375 Whelen


The article .375 Whelen has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Marked unreferenced for years. Unlike other ammunition with their own articles, I wasn't able to find significant coverage of the subject outside of lists, online forums and other types of wikis"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 23:04, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)