User talk:Kartasto

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Kartasto! I am WereSpielChequers and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. Thank you for your contributions. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions check out Questions, or feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or type helpme at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. Again, welcome!  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  21:14, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article

Speedy deletion nomination of The Beginning of Infinity


A tag has been placed on The Beginning of Infinity requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Borkificator (talk) 11:17, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

Copyvio
Hi Kartasto, Please do not copy and paste text from newspapers as you did here. This is copyright violation. Thanks, Ericoides (talk) 12:20, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Oslo explosion


Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Oslo explosion. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - 2011 Oslo Explosion. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at 2011 Oslo Explosion - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Vrenator (talk) 15:46, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your contribution. However there already was an existing article about the event so I redirected your page to that one. Please use search before you create an article to see if one already exists. SpeakFree (talk) 15:57, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Armin van Buuren feat. Laura V - Drowning


The article Armin van Buuren feat. Laura V - Drowning has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No indication that this is a notable song -- Google search just comes up with places to download it.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... disco spinster   talk  16:52, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Quantum entanglement, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Don Page. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Arrow of time
 * added a link pointing to Entanglement


 * Quantum entanglement
 * added a link pointing to Entanglement

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Financial revolution, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dutch. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

November 2015
Your recent editing history at Climatic Research Unit email controversy shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. &mdash; Jess &middot; &Delta;&hearts; 17:28, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:22, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Problem of time, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Entanglement. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 19 April
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:40, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
 * On the Many-worlds interpretation page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=716039720 your edit] caused a cite error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F716039720%7CMany-worlds interpretation%5D%5D Ask for help])

Disambiguation link notification for June 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tohloppi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conglomerate. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Innolink


A tag has been placed on Innolink requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Mean as custard (talk) 09:07, 5 July 2023 (UTC)


 * It is possible that Innolink is not (yet) remarkable enough for the international category.
 * But things are moving fast sometimes... Kartasto (talk) 09:20, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Innolink


The article Innolink has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Completely unsourced. The corresponding fi.wp article has some references, but they are all either independent (interviews etc.) or otherwise fail WP:CORPDEPTH."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ljleppan (talk) 21:09, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

wp:not
Wikipedia is not a wp:forum or wp:soapbox for publishing your wp:rr. Nor are talk pages for general discussion about the topic or for you to fish for information. Slatersteven (talk) 16:00, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

October 2023
One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information.

You have also been warned about this previously. (See ). Jähmefyysikko (talk) 08:18, 20 October 2023 (UTC)


 * I really can´t remember these data times...
 * 12:34, 20 October 2023
 * 13:11, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Explanation avainable from the logging (computing)? Kartasto (talk) 05:47, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 21
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Palestine–Russia relations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arab Socialist Union.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 21 October 2023 (UTC)


 * An automated process reacted quite slowly... Kartasto (talk) 06:08, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Symposium (painting) moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Symposium (painting). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 12:58, 20 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Yes. Thanks. The sources will be soon in it... Kartasto (talk) 16:07, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

November 2023
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Symposium (painting). This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Requests for history merge. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 01:34, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

I think - do You - that it is a bit diffent case when translated. When translated from different language, the content is not identical or not the same.

When I did my translation from Finnish to Englisg; some words and terms became altered althought Google´s translation engine became used for error-correction and for purposes concerning the aesthetics.

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
Bon courage (talk) 07:56, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

December 2023
Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:COVID-19 for general discussion of this or other topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See the talk page guidelines for more information. Also posting a topic of misinformation; use WP:RS sources. Zefr (talk) 06:28, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

Sources for COVID-19
On my talk page, you said:

I would like to have a conversation on a subject The Reliable Sources.

(For improving the article covid-19 in specific ways)

My argument is that the original source from the talk page can be peer revieved.

In other words; one can find the information from elsewhere. Or not?

How about these medias?

1. The Heritage Foundation’s Oversight Project has sued the CIA for access to documents related to its investigation into the origins of COVID-19

Source: The VLH Report

https://wltreport.com/2023/12/27/heritage-foundation-sues-cia-accuses-them-covid-cover/

2. Washington-based think tank says the agency ignored its Freedom of Information Act request after agency whistleblower testified to Congress

Source: The Epoch Times:

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/heritage-sues-cia-for-records-of-alleged-payoffs-to-suppress-covid-lab-leak-theory-5553922

3. An element of the Heritage Foundation is now suing the CIA for failure to fulfill a FOIA request demanding the documents that detailed these payments

Source: The BRP - BizPac Review - BPR is part of the publishing division owned by Olympic Media, a digital advertising and fundraising company.

https://www.bizpacreview.com/2023/12/27/cia-sued-for-covid-origin-records-amid-claim-agency-findings-swayed-by-monetary-incentives-1422947/

+ Finally, U.S. Department of State Archive Websites is a relevant database likewise for extra research.


 * None of these sources would be considered WP:RS. The COVID-19 article has plentiful sources and has been extensively edited by senior editors. Trust those sources. I am not going to debate with you over substandard, non-RS sources furthering conspiracy theories. Zefr (talk) 06:24, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

School motto
This may or may not interest you: Reference_desk/Entertainment. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 12:09, 23 February 2024 (UTC)