User talk:KartikeyaS343/Archives/2020/April

== Sir you falsely claim "not just materials produced by a creator, but published articles when in fact every single source provided were from published independent articles, please check your own bias" ==

Sir you falsely claim and publish in a public forum "not just materials produced by a creator, but published articles when in fact every single source provided were from published independent articles, please check your own bias, and your own opinions. ." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:46:201:7F10:B513:66AA:E8F8:39E9 (talk) 08:55, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
 * First of all, I am not sure which article or public form you are referring to? Can you please post a message after login into your Wikipedia account? If you think my claims are false then you can contest it if it is a speedy-deletion notice or you can refute my claims with proper sources. Please note that I will not be answering to your any further queries unless you point me to the context or the article. -- KartikeyaS (talk) 09:05, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

AFCP
Your name is still on the Participants list. What message you receiving that says you cannot use the tool? Primefac (talk) 01:29, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
 * the tool is loading now. I am not sure why the tool didn't load yesterday and I had to manually draftify a page. I can now review at AfC. Thanks again.-- KartikeyaS (talk) 05:31, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Discussion at AFD
I would like to bring your attention, for your inputs here 1, here 2 and here 3.– Akhiljaxxn (talk) 19:57, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
 * , I don't think it is a good idea and I am sorry, I will have to stay aloof for any possible WP:CANVASSING violations. Thanks, -- KartikeyaS (talk) 15:02, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Greetings - update to article submitted
Thank you for the feedback on my submission on Studio School Los Angeles. I have updated the submission by removing several sentences which be all the material that could be construed as promotional. My intent with this submission is to record the factual, objective information that is verified by 3rd party sources, as linked in the submission. If you would re-review, it would be appreciated. Thank you for the note. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Summergreen4 (talk • contribs) 06:50, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi ! Thank you for improving the article but as I see you haven't clicked on the "Resubmit" button at the end of the notice I placed at the top of the page. Please resubmit it so it can be reviewed again. Cheers! -- KartikeyaS (talk) 15:05, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for the guidance and noted. It has now been resubmitted. Summergreen4 (talk) 18:21, 6 April 2020 (UTC) Summergreen4

ANI Notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. GRIPK (talk) 13:08, 6 April 2020 (UTC) - another Wikibaji sock. -- KartikeyaS (talk) 08:53, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Nice work
I see GRIPK has been blocked as a sock. Nice work.  HighKing++ 19:20, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you :) -- KartikeyaS (talk) 08:53, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Have you considered that User:B-Factor may be another sock? Their contribution histories have some remarkable similarities. You appear to know more about the master socking of Wikibaji than I so your opinion is appreciated.  HighKing++ 09:29, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
Hello KartikeyaS343. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:KartikeyaS343. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 06:06, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Your decline
In declining the article for the Albanian Ambassador to the UN for not passing GNG, you did not consider that he meets WP:POLITICIAN. See Draft:Thanas Shkurti. Please promote the article. --2604:2000:E010:1100:55B4:41F7:D41B:DD37 (talk) 07:32, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Editing the Article For Prajakta Koli
Hi Kartikeya,

Hope this message finds you well, I wanted to inform you I have no financial gains from the edits I am making. The edits that I have made especially for Prajakta Koli. She is someone whose activity I follow closely and hence edit her article frequently. I would be happy to give you a declaration regarding the same. Let me know how can we proceed with the same.

Additionally I wanted clarity on how I can re-add the Awards and Honors section as it suggested that there was no proper citation provided wherein I had used the citations from direct sources. Would be glad if you could share your feedback on the same

Draft International Franchise Association Page
Hello. Wanted to check back in with you about a draft page you'd helped with a few weeks back. The concern was including reliable sources, which now include Reuters, the U.S. Census Bureau, CNBC, Guidestar, etc. Do you feel this meets the bar?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:International_Franchise_Association

Editing1002 (talk) 18:16, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Help me improve my draft
You commented on the draft i created Draft:Desmond Ho on 22 March 2020. You mentioned about removing links from the content sections and remove trivia. Would you please point out which links you are referring? --Cottonpayne (talk) 06:00, 26 April 2020 (UTC)Cottonpayne--Cottonpayne (talk) 06:00, 26 April 2020 (UTC)