User talk:KartikeyaS343/Archives/2020/March

Speedy deletion declined: Keen.com
Hello KartikeyaS343, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Keen.com, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''If an experienced user accepted the draft, there is a presumption that they believed the topic to be notable enough for inclusion and deletion thus controversial. Speedy deletion can only used for clearly uncontroversial deletion requests however. If you are interested in learning more about how speedy deletion works, I have compiled a list of helpful pages at User:SoWhy/SDA'''. You can of course also contact me if you have questions. Thank you. So Why  08:35, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much. I appreciate the help. --KartikeyaS343 (talk) 08:36, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Deanna Barch
I added categories to her Wikipedia page and I also add scholarly articles.

acroospulle 14:45, 23 January 2020 (UTC)Acroospulle — Preceding unsigned comment added by Acroospulle (talk • contribs)
 * I have removed the Uncategorised tag as you added some categories. Please have a look at WP:NPROF. Best, --KartikeyaS343 (talk) 16:53, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

British Psychotherapy Foundation
Hello there, as you placed the lack of sources template on the brand new article, would you mind please, checking whether there are now sufficient verifiable sources to remove the template? Thanks, --Po Mieczu (talk) 16:49, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi! Thank you for improving the article. I have removed the template from the top of the page. Best, --KartikeyaS343 (talk) 05:31, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Abraham Trommius
You seem to have acepted this article although it contain an inline external reference to the corresponding article in the Dutch WP. We do not do it that way, We add the link as an interlanguage link after the article has been made., and add a note about the translation. I'm revising it to show you how.  DGG ( talk ) 06:33, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes please and thank you for the help. --KartikeyaS343 (talk) 06:34, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Azad Hamoto
15:47, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Hello KartikeyaS343, my article isn't about Creation, the source in arabic is about how the language is like a Being!

Thanks, Marco Express — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marco Express (talk • contribs) 15:47, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi, if you have improved the article then you can resubmit for another review. --KartikeyaS343 (talk) 19:53, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

DDG Article
KartikeyaS343 I just got the notification you rejected my article base on the fact you claim that the references are not from a reliable source, complex.com isnt a reliable source are you serious? M01001111 (talk) 17:12, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Please read the guidelines about the sources needed to pass the notability criteria. Thank you. --KartikeyaS343 (talk) 16:44, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Regarding Draft: Shripad Vaidya
Sorry to say that you have rejected the submission without giving any genuine reason and not by following the policy made for guiding new editors. I am a new editor and I have regularly taken the advice from other experienced editors and they have also contributed to some extent for this article. As I am a new editor, you should have given me a chance for improving the article rather than stopping its editing process. I have taken a lot of hard work for this article and working on it for many months. It is requested to provide opportunities instead of discouraging the hard work of the new editors. MA$HRVA (Talk) Write Right!! 13:48, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Based on your edits, you do not seem to be a new editor. Anyway, I have provided a reason when declining it. Please, respond to this COI message before making any further edits. Thank you. --KartikeyaS343 (talk) 16:37, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Allegation of personal attacks
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. -- Harshil want to talk? 14:42, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the note. I have provided my response there. Hope this helps. KartikeyaS343 (talk) 15:04, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

About Robert Ronny page
Hi KartikeyaS343 about Robert Ronny page that you declined, I believe I have put a lot of news article including a deep coverage about him, so what do you want me to change for the pages got accepted? Thanks
 * , your submission was rejected again. I suggest you please read the formatting guidelines and use it in your article before submitting it again. Thank you. --KartikeyaS343 (talk) 15:59, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

User:KartikeyaS343/common.css
I'm no JavaScript expert but I'm pretty sure this won't do anything. This is stuff that should be at User:KartikeyaS343/common.js. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 12:59, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
 * , thank you, I appreciate it but I am still unable to get the desired result. --KartikeyaS343 (talk) 15:57, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Not sure what 'the desired result' is, but if you need help, usually WP:VPT is a good place to go. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 17:18, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

deletion of page on Passu Tshering
I see you have deleted this page, but not given any reason beyond the template for not being notable - "they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject". To receive a national medal from the king of Bhutan is significant. Perhaps not to you, but in the context of the country, it doesn't get much bigger. (see wikipedia entry for explanation, which it links to). Three references to Kuensel are provided. That is the national newspaper, an independent source, and one is a profile on Bhutan Toilet Organisation, which was started by this man. Again, may I suggest that the importance of the Bhutan Toilet Organisation may not appear significant to someone in the west, but this organisation is based on the World Toilet Organisation. That it has made such significant changes to the lives of Bhutanese is evident by the King's medal and the write-up in the national newspaper. The article is short, but intended to start a page about this very important Bhutanese man so that others can later add to it, in keeping with Wikipedia practice. I would ask that you reconsider this article, based on the significance of this man to Bhutan - the country's biggest blogger, a recipient of the king's medal, the founder of an important civil organisation, and the focus of independent media such as Kuensel. 17todotest (talk) 00:26, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Neither me nor has deleted your page. It is not approved for publishing yet. Please go through the policies and improve the article accordingly before submitting it again for a review. --KartikeyaS343 (talk) 06:59, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
 * With all due respect, I did. I added more references. I'm not sure why they are not accepted as reliable. They are two independent newspapers and two academic texts, published by reputable academic publishers. The man was awarded a medal by the king and had profiles written by two respected Bhutanese newspapers. Please can you explain why they are not deemed suitable. It feels like an arbitrary decision, so I would really like to understand the rationale so that I can learn 17todotest (talk) 08:50, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Thank you Note :)
Dear KartikeyaS343: Thank you for the acceptance of the article Mohammed Suhail Chinya Salimpasha

Would you please have a look at the Indian Patent Office Page Indian Patent Office - The Title has to be changed to "office of the controller general of patents designs and trademarks, GOI"

quantumdots-x (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 05:17, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Manushpatrika.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Manushpatrika.png, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

David Robinson (artist)
Hello KartikeyaS343, Thanks so much for reviewing my submission. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:David_Robinson_(artist)

Would you be willing to give me some more specific feedback?

Your comment implied that my citations were sourced from the subject but they were all independent. I also thought that the article read as neutral (except perhaps the Reviews and Commentary, which were all from independent sources - plus I've seen laudatory reviews on other artist pages such as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Kelly_(artist)) I'm happy to delete the reviews if that will allow publication.

It would really help me edit the piece if you could point out specific issues in the text.

Thanks so much! SageMacG (talk) 20:54, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of XOR (company) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article XOR (company) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/XOR (company) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Slowthin (talk) 06:16, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
Don't refer people as a sock puppet without evidence like you did here. See WP:ASPERSIONS. Aman Kumar Goel(Talk) 08:43, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
 * The evidences are very clear and already provided here. -- KartikeyaS (talk ) 08:48, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
 * It is called allegation, not evidence. Evidence is when the person has been blocked as a sock. Until then you will have to wait. Aman Kumar Goel(Talk) 09:03, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
 * What I put there is evidence against my allegation. Anyway, I agree I should wait before the evidences which seem very clear to me, are evalutated by a CU. -- KartikeyaS (talk ) 09:07, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Ine Back Iversen
Hi KartikeyaS343. Thank you for reviewing my article Draft:Ine Back Iversen, I'm trying really hard to fix this so i was wondering, since the reason you are giving for declining it is unreliable sources, can you please point out which ones are unreliable so i can remove them or at least fix the problem? I have used many sources in this article and have followed the guidelines so i am having a hard time understanding which one you mean. I really appreciate your time and hope you can help me so that i can resolve this issue. (Terminalbud (talk) 02:13, 7 March 2020 (UTC))
 * Hi there! I have not checked in details but sources like Youtube or IMDb are not considered as reliable sources. If you have questions about any source then you can ask at the reliable source noticeboard. Best, -- KartikeyaS (talk ) 16:35, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Nick McKenzie
What is going on here? Adding an "undisclosed paid editing" tag atop a BLP without evidence is a massive BLP violation. There's nothing in your edit history around that time that suggests you know anything we don't and you don't name who you think the "undisclosed paid editor" is. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 19:46, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
 * have you checked this? Please take a look at the SPI. -- KartikeyaS (talk ) 19:48, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
 * You just linked to a longstanding Australian editor adding a category to the article. What are you talking about? The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 19:50, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I did not get you! The article was created by this sockpuupet, see this.-- KartikeyaS (talk ) 19:53, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Please see this. I have added COI tag but if you still think I made a mistake then you are welcome to revert my edit. Thank you. -- KartikeyaS (talk ) 20:00, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation. The original article was an unsourced pile of junk that has been extensively reworked, sourced and expanded by other editors in the nearly six years since it was created. It might not have hurt to review the diff you just cited to me above before you did that tagging (which would have pointed the rewrite out to you); I'm pretty unimpressed that you then tried to COI tag it after you'd linked me that diff.

Trying to tag the article on one of Australia's most respected investigative journalists with multiple paid editing/COI tags like a scarlet letter for the rest of time after being completely rewritten because a suspect account created a completely different version of the article six years ago is verging perilously close (at best) to a BLP violation in my book. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 20:06, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I have nothing personal with "Nick McKenzie" but the fact still remains that the article was created by a UPE sock and it has significant contributions from other socks as well. I tagged it with COI because the article's talk page itself has been tagged with COI. Anyway, you have already reverted those edits and I have nothing more to say on this. KartikeyaS (talk ) 20:19, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion tagging - G5
Hello, KartikeyaS343, Please be more careful with your speedy deletion tagging. We only delete pages that have been created by a previously blocked editor, that is a sockpuppet, someone who is trying to avoid their block and pages that have no substantial edits by others. The blocked editor was the only contributor. Wikipedia does not go back into the contributions and delete pages created by an editor who is subsequently blocked. And there has to be a clear connection between a page creator and a previously blocked account, either through a sockpuppet investigation or an indication in their block log, not on suspicion alone.

Please read over Criteria for speedy deletion for more information. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 19:59, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the information. I appreciate it. -- KartikeyaS (talk ) 20:01, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Multiple Speedy Deletion
Why you are tagged the article for speedy deletion multiple times? Please read WP:CSD. Slowthin (talk) 06:30, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
 * The subject does not meet the notability guidelines. It was speed died. Why are you keep creating it? Please explain if you have any WP:COI. -- KartikeyaS (talk ) 06:33, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
 * My dear friend KartikeyaS343, i think you didn't get my question. My question is "Why are you applying same Deletion tag again and again. If you think the article must not be there on Wikipedia you must tagged this article using "Propose Deletion' or 'Deletion Discussion'. And for your information i am not a paid user. Slowthin (talk) 09:31, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

==Speedy deletion nomination of Luma Health==

A tag has been placed on Luma Health, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. UK-E79 (talk) 06:49, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Blocked as sock.-- KartikeyaS (talk ) 06:33, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

== Nomination of Luma Health for deletion == A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Luma Health is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Luma Health& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. UK-E79 (talk) 06:52, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Blocked as sock.-- KartikeyaS (talk ) 06:33, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

KKCG decline - not english sources?
Hi KartikeyaS343, our article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:KKCG) was declined due to not significant references. I'd like to ask, if I can use more sources not in English language? We have our Czech Wiki page, there are no problems about sources (https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/KKCG). Thank you so much, Marthy007 (talk) 10:10, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi Marthy007, you can use non-English sources but English-language sources are preferred. -- KartikeyaS (talk ) 16:05, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

A little help with a draft page.
Hello KartikeyaS343, Thanks so much for reviewing my submission. I'm a bit confused on the reason you declined my submission. Can you please explain it a bit more detail. A lot of the articles I cited are references used in other articles on wikipedia.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:NATO_Watch_Strap — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiwonders13 (talk • contribs) 17:19, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Your article has already been accepted by another senior reviewer. Best, -- KartikeyaS (talk ) 06:32, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Important Notice
Doug Weller talk 07:36, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you but I already got this notice few days ago. -- KartikeyaS (talk ) 07:39, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Sorry, Twinkle didn't show me or I didn't read the message carefully . Doug Weller  talk 07:46, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
 * No problem, cheers! :) -- KartikeyaS (talk ) 07:48, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Jonah Baize Submission
Hello,

Recently the Jonah Baize submission was not approved due to "This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified.". I'm unsure what the exact issue is. Would you please provide more detail so that I may resubmit and get approved?

Thank you, Jbfitzgerald (talk) 15:14, 10 March 2020 (UTC)Chris Davis
 * Hi, your submission is not adequately sourced for instance the whole Awards and honors, Real estate sections are unsourced. You also cannot use a press release for citation. -- KartikeyaS (talk ) 16:27, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

David Robinson (artist)
Hello KartikeyaS343,

Would you mind giving me some more specific feedback about how my draft https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:David_Robinson_(artist) needs to be edited?

I've tried to understand how your critique applies but I'm having trouble. More specific examples would be appreciated greatly.

I've double checked my citations and they all look independent and reliable to me. I'm also having trouble understanding the neutrality critique when I see the same kind of content on published pages.

I've also added some notes on the talk page for the draft to address the Notability question raised by user Theroadislong.

Thank you in advance for any additional help you can offer! SageMacG (talk) 20:31, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you for asking. Please make sure all the information you wrote in the article can be verified from independent reliable sources. -- KartikeyaS (talk ) 20:28, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Thank you KartikeyaS343, I appreciate you taking the time :) I believe I have included appropriate sources for everything. Are there any specific instances that don't meet the criteria? Thank you again! SageMacG (talk) 21:24, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I would request you to edit the article to remove all promotional words/tone. See WP:NPOV for more details. Best, KartikeyaS (talk ) 18:59, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

Hi KartikeyaS343, sorry to be so slow, but I've looked at WP:NPOV and I still don't know what you mean. A lot of what I see in NPOV is that it's okay to transparently cite biased opinions as long as you're being balanced in articulating the whole range of opinions about the subject, good and bad. I have not found any published criticism of the artist or his work, so these reviews represent the published sentiment about this artist. I also tried to stay neutral everywhere other than the reviews. When I look at other articles mine seems in line with published pieces. For example, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vikky_Alexander uses language in multiple subsections that is more promotional than all my sections except my "Reviews and Commentary", and a lot of theirs is uncited. And other pages such as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Kelly_(artist) quote positive reviews the same way that I have - plus his are almost all from exhibition catalogues which are a somewhat COI source compared to magazine and journal articles which I used for 2 out of 3 of mine. So I haven't been able to identify what parts of my article are the issue. Thanks for any further explanation that can help me see what I'm missing. SageMacG (talk) 19:45, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

A bit of discussion
Hi there. I received notification that you've made some changes to some of the pages I recently created. I welcome them and I'm working on improving my understand of how things work here on Wikipedia. I'd like to make discussion here individually on each page.

Faisal Al Ahmari: I've made my comment on deletion page. May be the source to Khalejia have confused you about the verification of the sources. I didn't try to manipulate it. It is subsidiary of Rotana Group.

Gavin Brazg and Caroline Arewa: While creating a new page, I usually go around the category page related to the subject and edit multiple pages to develop sense how other pages are written in specific category. These two pages match the same looks. I've added sources that are notable on Wikipedia. Any advice is welcoming.

Thank you for your time. Lunar Clock (talk) 22:07, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi, regarding Faisal Al Ahmari, the person doesn't pass the GNG criteria. Not just a single source but several other references you used there don't even mention this person at all. The same goes for both Gavin Brazg and Caroline Arewa. The references either do not mention them or only passing mention. Not enough to even pass the GNG criteria. Best, KartikeyaS (talk ) 19:03, 13 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Thank you. I guess I need to work on my understanding. It's appreciated. Lunar Clock (talk) 20:32, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Quicklink
Hi, could you please advise on what to change for review. As in the notes, the link reference to the Quicklink website should be removed. Is there anything else that can be removed to increase the likelihood of the page being published?

I'm also trying to fix the broken Quicklink link here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VP6 (Reference 4 & 5)

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bethan Hill (talk • contribs) 12:21, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
 * you will need to add independent reliable sources for citations. The links you used are unreliable, self-published. Best, -- KartikeyaS (talk ) 07:00, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Hi,

Understood, I've removed the self-published citations, so now only independent citations remain. Could you please advise and let me know if I should resubmit?

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bethan Hill (talk • contribs) 12:19, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Hi KartikeyaS343 Thank you for your response on Draft:Jubaili Bros article. Appreciate your feedback. I've seen several articles on Wikipedia, using similar references/citations to what I did. However still my article is not getting approved. Would you please help me out. Can you google the term 'Jubaili Bros' and look out for the suitable citation ?

Awaiting your cooperation. Thanks Sheeraz.jb (talk) 09:13, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
 * You need to read WP:RS again. I can still see unreliable links in your draft. On a side note, if you have a COI with it then please disclose. Best, KartikeyaS (talk ) 16:53, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Draft:BookBub review
Hi there, My draft for BookBub (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:BookBub) was declined because it didn't have significant coverage from independent sources. However, all of my source articles have BookBub as the main topic and most of them are reliable (the guardian, wallstreet journal, boston.com, business insider). Can you give me some ideas on what I can do to show notability? I could link to this story (which I'm not sure is considered independent enough) about how it impacts independent authors when they are rejected by publishers. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/it-isnt-amazon-publishers_b_8307708 I could also add info from this article about how they have 15 million subscribers, 120 employees, and launched an audiobook version. https://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/industry-news/publisher-news/article/81874-bookbub-and-an-age-old-question-what-to-read-next.html

Anyway, thanks for taking the time to review articles and I hope you can give me some tips to improve this.

RayScript (talk) 16:49, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Please check WP:BK and WP:SPAM. -- KartikeyaS (talk ) 16:14, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Draft: Agarwal Movers Group
Hi Kartikeya,

I'm the author of Agarwal Movers Group. Could you help me ascertain the requirements to fix the article? I'd be really grateful.

Rm 1309 (talk) 19:35, 17 March 2020 (UTC)Rm 1309 18th March, 2020

New page reviewer granted
Hi KartikeyaS343. Your account has been added to the " " user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember: The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. signed,Rosguill talk 21:27, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging  pages for  maintenance so  that  they are aware.
 * You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
 * If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
 * Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.
 * Thank you very much . KartikeyaS (talk ) 14:50, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

Khan Shatyr Mountain
Hi, I saw that you reviewed Khan Shatyr Mountain, but you failed to notice that the seven inline citations were to wikipedia articles. Wikipedia cannot be used as a source for articles. I have removed the bad refs. I have also tagged the article for lacking a lead section and needing inline citations. Please take time when you review new articles and check things carefully, thanks. Schazjmd  (talk)  20:40, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
 * my apologies. Thank you for bringing this to my notice. I have just unreviewed the article. -- KartikeyaS (talk ) 20:42, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Khatabook
There seems to be a disagreement on whether the Khatabook article is ready for mainspace. You have suggested this might be a case of WP:UPE. In your opinion, what should happen now? Should User:Prakashchinna be warned for edit warring? I was certainly surprised when he reported you at WP:AIV. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 04:00, 22 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Dear fellow Wikipedians, I reported about Mr.Karthikeya, after looking at his log, as i found most of his edits were not about article creations,but of articles removal. So, I assumed he may be a vandalism attacker. This is the reason why brought the account to the administrators notice. Educate me if my assumptions were wrong. I was bit confused when User:EdJohnston was asking an advice from the user, on taking an action!!. I hope you guys knew each other? -- Prakashchinna (talk) 04:13, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Prakashchinna, my analysis suggests that you are the one in the wrong. You have twice moved Draft:Khatabook to main space as Khatabook without waiting for the normal result of the WP:AFC process. In fact, you removed the AfC template from the article. To avoid sanctions, I suggest you agree that the page be made a draft once again and you promise to wait for the decision of the AfC reviewers. Your use of the term 'vandalism' in your edit summaries is incorrect and may be blockable if it continues. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 04:20, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Hi EdJohnston, if you feel the same. No issues, I will not further edit or interfere at that particular page which you mentioned. I will work on other pages. Thank you - Prakashchinna (talk) 04:44, 22 March 2020 (UTC)


 * , thank you for the note. I did it based on the listing at Wikiproject SPAM by . Based on their edit pattern, it does give me paid-editing vibes too so in my opinion, it would have been best to get the articles listed at AFC for a review however you are much senior editor and an administrator so I would prefer your decision as the best option in this case. Thanks, KartikeyaS (talk ) 05:53, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet of. MER-C 10:07, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks, User:MER-C and User:KartikeyaS343. It appears that the anti-spam system is working as intended. Particularly surprising that Prakashchinna accepted the draft submitted by Riedits. That's about as daring as reporting a patroller at AIV for doing what they are supposed to do. EdJohnston (talk) 13:53, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks to both of you for resolving the matter :) KartikeyaS (talk ) 06:27, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Kabir Helminski
Thanks for your comment on my article under review: Kabir Helminski. In light of it, I have now removed any statements that are not verified by an independent reliable source, with the following exceptions: statements which simply list Helminski's books (I assume I don't have to provide a footnote linking to the publisher's page for each book); brief quotations from his books (again, I assume I do not have to provide a footnote linking to the book itself on the publisher's website). It would be much appreciated if you could let me know if this article now meets requirements in your opinion. Danthedervish (talk) 16:13, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I saw your article has already been submitted so please wait for a reviewer to review it. Best, KartikeyaS (talk ) 06:55, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Mistake
Hello KartikeyaS343 as you know i love to write I write people biography, actor biography notable person, etc. I search online about celebrities, notable persons, films, etc. Then I write. If i did some mistake so please help me and solve it.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by RoZTaly (talk • contribs) 08:02, 24 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Hi, please declare any WP:COI you have or reply to the message posted on your talk page. KartikeyaS (talk ) 08:05, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Mistake
Hello, I write only public figure, celebrity,films articles. I search online about these and write. If did some mistake please help to solve. So that I can make Wikipedia even better. I love to contribute on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RoZTaly (talk • contribs) 09:21, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

About Britt Wadner
Hi KartikeyaS343,

I have declined the speedy deletion of this article. From what I can see, it meets the two parts of the assertion of "significance", if not notability. WP:SIGNIFICANCE is an "essay", not one of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

I have based my decision mostly on the information contained on the https://kulturportallund.se website, in particular
 * Wadner, Britt (1915-1987), entreprenör, piratradiochef (in Swedish)

According to its "about us" page, the website
 * is associated with the Kulturen museum in Lund, Sweden
 * asserts that uses the "Lund's conservation program, the City Library's Lund Collection"

It would appear to me that the article meets the two-part assertion of significance test:
 * "plausible": arguably yes
 * "discoverable": arguably yes

All this to and fro for an article that may not not be kept in a WP:AFD discussion?

Well, start that AfD.

Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 12:15, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
 * thank you for the explanation. I will ask the creator to improve it further. KartikeyaS (talk ) 06:01, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

UPE
Hi, please do not add UPE tags to articles based on guesswork. It cannot be assumed that SPAs are automatically UPEs and moving articles to draftspace based on guesswork is disruptive, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 21:12, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes, quite apart from apparent unpaid COI, many new good faith editors write in a promotional style because they see so much promotionalism  in Wikipedia, nd in the real world even more  so, that they assume it's what we want here.  DGG ( talk ) 04:22, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I do not make assumptions based on promotional style of the article but I also check other factors like the editor's contribution history, when did they register and started editing etc. Anyway, I will be more careful next time. KartikeyaS (talk ) 05:50, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

CSDs in general
CSD A7 is only for articles that make to plausible claim to significance, not for those which do assert something of significance, that does not amount to our definition of notability. Attempts to change the defiition into to claim to notability have always failed to obtain consensus;; if there's any good faith claim to importance, the community, not a signle deleting admin, needs to evaluate it.
 * And, for Bi Shumin, an assertion that someone has won a national level literary award is not only such an indication of significance, but a good reason to think there will be sufficient references to establish notability at AfD.  You've been tagging a good many speedys--Ias an admin who has deleted tens of thousands of articles, most of them by speedy,  I'm not at all reluctant to delete those that are hopeless, but if there is any plausible possibility of an article, speedy is inappropriate   DGG ( talk ) 04:26, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Understood, . Thank you for the note. I will be more careful with the tool. KartikeyaS (talk ) 05:52, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Re: Victor Begg notability
Hello! I'm seeking further feedback on the Victor Begg article. I read through the notability guidelines, and I wanted some clarification. While there is reference to his memoir for autobiographical information, all of the other links come from third party sources. And despite some of those being his own pieces, they were sources utilized to prove his publication on locally and nationally-syndicated columns from reputable news sources that serve local and national audiences. Are there specific sections that could be spruced up or added to so that it could prove his notability? I believe that his awards and "Michiganian of the Year" recognition is just the beginning of his notability, alongside his interfaith efforts for decades in metro Detroit. Additionally, his sources span from the decade. I am happy to do more research, I would just like specific feedback on where I should begin. Thank you for your review of the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Codyharrell (talk • contribs) 15:26, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I see someone has drafitified it so you may submit it for a review at WP:AFC. Best, -- KartikeyaS (talk ) 06:03, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Jonah Baize Rejected Submission
My article was denied due to, "This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified.". I've been trying to get an answer as to why and what needs to be cited better.

Please let me know so that I can complete this srticle.

Jbfitzgerald (talk) 15:42, 25 March 2020 (UTC)Chris Davis
 * I left a comment on ways to improve the draft. Please check and tell me if you still have questions. Best, -- KartikeyaS (talk ) 06:28, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Simon Ogston Filmmaker deletion
Greetings, It seems I did not provide sufficient detail of why Mr OGston is important to the history of documentary film in New Zealand. I can add such material without problem. COuld you please provide me with the material you deleted? I do not have a copy, and I had to ask some other users and researchers for correct titles and dates. This information was carefully edited, and faultlessly presented. I would really appreciate it if you could return it to me. Thank you in advance. Kindest regards. RexShogun — Preceding unsigned comment added by RexShogun (talk • contribs) 20:46, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
 * , you already have it as a Draft:Simon Ogston where you can improve it and submit for a review by a reviewer. Best, -- KartikeyaS (talk ) 06:30, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Moved page Draft:Chabba Cheema to Chabba Cheema
You violate Wikipedia Notability policy for geographic features (WP:GEOLAND). Which clearly mark Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable, even if their population is very low.Alialigalig (talk) 17:33, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I don't know who to delete Drafts and redirect pages so please delete Draft:Chabba Cheema and also, teach me.Alialigalig (talk) 17:41, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

CSD again
A few days ago you said that you would be more careful with tagging articles for speedy deletion. You have not done so. Being in the permanent collection of a notable gallery, and exhibiting at others, is a very clear indication of importance/significance, which is a lower standard than notability. Phil Bridger (talk) 10:40, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
 * And I have just noticed that Egan Frantz had been accepted at AfC by User:Sulfurboy shortly before you tagged it for speedy deletion. If you think that an article that has been accepted there is deserving of speedy deletion then it would be best to take the matter up with the accepting editor first rather than simply apply a speedy deletion template. Phil Bridger (talk) 12:20, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
 * my apologies for this but if you check my contributions I have been more careful and the rest of my CSD tags have no problem. When I tagged Egan Frantz for CSD, it has no supporting reliable sources for the exhibitions. Anyway, I could have been more careful and I appreciate your note. I will stay away from CSDs for few days and contribute more to AfDs. -- KartikeyaS (talk ) 06:20, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for moving the IFA page to draft
I appreciate the tip and will get to work on improving citations. Editing1002 (talk) 00:07, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Please do not use any external links in the content section and some of the references you used for citations are not reliable sources. -- KartikeyaS (talk ) 06:23, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Your signature
Please be aware that your signature has misnested  tags, which are causing missing end tag lint errors.

You are encouraged to change
 * : KartikeyaS (talk )

to
 * : KartikeyaS  (talk)

—Anomalocaris (talk) 03:39, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Ah! I didn't know that. Thank you. -- KartikeyaS (talk) 05:51, 30 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Thank you for fixing your signature! —Anomalocaris (talk) 09:02, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Draft:SparkPost
You declined this draft as having an advertising tone. Were you able to establish notability for this subject? ~Kvng (talk) 14:12, 30 March 2020 (UTC)